Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239513›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2020

Financial implications of biparametric prostate MRI.

Kristin K Porter, Alex King, Samuel J Galgano, Rachael L Sherrer, Jennifer B Gordetsky, Soroush Rais-Bahrami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin K PorterDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. kkporter@uabmc.edu.
Alex KingDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Samuel J GalganoDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Rachael L SherrerDepartment of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jennifer B GordetskyDepartment of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Soroush Rais-BahramiDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-9925
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) targeted biopsy has been shown to identify more clinically-significant cancers and reduce the detection of clinically-insignificant disease when compared to systematic biopsy; however, the wide-spread accessibility of MP-MRI is limited. A potential strategy for reducing the cost, study time, and contrast-associated risks associated with MP-MRI is elimination of the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequence, relying instead on biparametric MRI (BP-MRI). BP-MRI has been shown to have a diagnostic accuracy and cancer detection rate that are equivalent to those of MP-MRI.

methodsWe modeled the potential cost of BP-MRI compared to MP-MRI to determine what cost savings would occur if DCE was eliminated from these studies.

resultsWhen controlled for a 45 min time window that allows for one full MP-MRI or three full BP-MRI studies, the BP-MRI 45 min gross profit is $1531.32. This is an increase in gross profit of $892.58 for the 45 min time window or $10,710.98 in a 9-h business day when performing BP-MRI compared to MP-MRI for prostate cancer detection.

conclusionsBP-MRI has the potential to result in substantial cost benefit and increased access to MRI in the diagnostic workflow and risk-stratification of men being evaluated for prostate cancer when compared to conventional MP-MRI.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsContrast MediaCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ManagementHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatic NeoplasmsReimbursement MechanismsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID31239513
OpenAlexW2953860202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.