Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239304›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Effects of flow rate on transnasal pulmonary aerosol delivery of bronchodilators via high-flow nasal cannula for patients with COPD and asthma: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Jie Li, Jian Luo, Yibing Chen, Lixing Xie, James B Fink

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03739359 (Investigating the Role of Gas Flow in Transnasal Pulmonary Aerosol Delivery Via Nasal Cannula), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03739359 nacompletednot on this map

Investigating the Role of Gas Flow in Transnasal Pulmonary Aerosol Delivery Via Nasal Cannula: A Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2019Enrolled75ConditionsCOPD AsthmaArmsnasal cannula gas flow
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie Li *Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0121-1291
Jian Luo *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Yibing Chen *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Function Test Lab, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Lixing XieDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Function Test Lab, General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
James B FinkDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rush University · USSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBoth in vitro and in vivo radiolabelled studies on nebulisation via high-flow nasal cannula showed that inhaled dose decreases as the administered gas flow increases. In our previous in vitro study, we investigated the effects of the ratio of gas flow to subject's peak inspiratory flow (GF:IF) on the aerosol deposition, which increased as the GF:IF decreased, with an optimal GF:IF between 0.1 and 0.5 producing a stable 'lung' deposition in both quiet and distressed breathing. Thus, we aim to validate our in vitro findings in subjects with reversible airflow limitations by assessing their response to inhaled bronchodilator. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma with positive response to 400μg albuterol via metered dose inhaler and valved holding chamber will be enrolled and consented. After a washout period (1-3 days), subjects will be randomly assigned to inhale albuterol with one of three gas flows: 50 L/min, GF:IF=1.0 and GF:IF=0.5. In each arm, subjects will inhale 2 mL saline, followed by escalating doubling doses (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg) of albuterol in a fill volume of 2 mL, delivered by a vibrating mesh nebuliser via heated nasal cannula set up at 37°C. An interval of 30 min between each dose of albuterol, with spirometry measured at baseline and after each inhalation. Titration will be terminated if forced expiratory volume in 1 s improvement is <5%, or adverse event is observed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the Ethic Committee of People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China (no. S2018-200-01). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03739359; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AsthmaCannulaDrug Delivery SystemsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAdultAerosolsBronchodilator AgentsEquipment DesignFemaleHumansInhalationMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Function TestsAerosolsBronchodilator Agentsbronchodilator agentsdose-response relationshipflow settinghigh-flow nasal cannula

Identifiers

PMID31239304
PMCPMC6597746
OpenAlexW2954265850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.