Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239137›Full record

ArticleProgress in brain research2019

The velocity storage time constant: Balancing between accuracy and precision.

Faisal Karmali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How Peripheral Vestibular Damage Affects Velocity Storage: a Causative Explanation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Faisal KarmaliDepartment of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Jenks Vestibular Physiology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: faisal_karmali@meei.harvard.edu.

Funding

Measuring and Isolating Imprecision in Vestibular Perception and ActionR03DC013635 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI KARMALI, FAISAL · 2015 to 2017
$492k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The velocity storage mechanism is often described in terms of the exponential decay in eye velocity in an upright subject who experiences a constant velocity yaw rotation after a rapid acceleration. The velocity storage time constant for this decay is roughly 6-30s, which means that for low-frequency head rotations, eye velocity and perceptions have large errors compared to actual motion. One may wonder if there would be benefits to having a longer time constant, which would improve accuracy. In this paper, simulations are used to highlight that improved accuracy may come at the cost of increased noise-i.e., reduced precision. Specifically, since the velocity storage mechanism extends the 5.7s time constant of the semicircular canal, it must be performing an integration process over a certain frequency range. In fact, all mathematical models of velocity storage include an integration. This integration would also integrate neural noise. Thus, increasing the velocity storage time constant would lead to integration over a wider range of frequencies, resulting in more noise in the brain's estimate of motion. Simulation results show this accuracy-precision tradeoff. Recent evidence is also reviewed supporting the hypothesis that the brain optimizes the velocity storage time constant to resolve this accuracy-precision tradeoff during aging and with variations in stimulus amplitude.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalBrainHumansMotion PerceptionProprioceptionReflex, Vestibulo-OcularVelocity storageVestibulo-ocular reflex

Identifiers

PMID31239137
PMCPMC9103412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.