ArticleProgress in brain research2019
The velocity storage time constant: Balancing between accuracy and precision.
Article in Progress in brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential lesson from a model-based exploration on treatment effect heterogeneity of mal de débarquement syndrome.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Symptom reduction in mal de débarquement syndrome with attenuation of the velocity storage contribution in the central vestibular pathways.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Article
- How Peripheral Vestibular Damage Affects Velocity Storage: a Causative Explanation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Imbalance and dizziness caused by unilateral vestibular schwannomas correlate with vestibulo-ocular reflex precision and bias.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Vestibular Precision at the Level of Perception, Eye Movements, Posture, and Neurons.Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Measuring optokinetic after-nystagmus: potential for detecting patients with signs of visual dependence following concussion.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- Measuring Vestibular Contributions to Age-Related Balance Impairment: A Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The velocity storage mechanism is often described in terms of the exponential decay in eye velocity in an upright subject who experiences a constant velocity yaw rotation after a rapid acceleration. The velocity storage time constant for this decay is roughly 6-30s, which means that for low-frequency head rotations, eye velocity and perceptions have large errors compared to actual motion. One may wonder if there would be benefits to having a longer time constant, which would improve accuracy. In this paper, simulations are used to highlight that improved accuracy may come at the cost of increased noise-i.e., reduced precision. Specifically, since the velocity storage mechanism extends the 5.7s time constant of the semicircular canal, it must be performing an integration process over a certain frequency range. In fact, all mathematical models of velocity storage include an integration. This integration would also integrate neural noise. Thus, increasing the velocity storage time constant would lead to integration over a wider range of frequencies, resulting in more noise in the brain's estimate of motion. Simulation results show this accuracy-precision tradeoff. Recent evidence is also reviewed supporting the hypothesis that the brain optimizes the velocity storage time constant to resolve this accuracy-precision tradeoff during aging and with variations in stimulus amplitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.