Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31239100›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2019

Surgical decision-making in infants with suspected UPJ obstruction: stakeholder perspectives.

V M Vemulakonda, M K Hamer, A Kempe, M A Morris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Does marginalization status and distance from the hospital impact the timing of pediatric pyeloplasty in a universal access-to-care system?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V M VemulakondaDepartment of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital Colorado; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: Vijaya.Vemulakonda@childrenscolorado.org.
M K HamerAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, USA.
A KempeAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, USA.
M A MorrisAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, USA.
Outcomes Research Consortium · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Understanding Practice Variations in Treatment of Infants with Suspected UPJ ObstructionK08HS024597 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VEMULAKONDA, VIJAYA M. · 2016 to 2020
$744k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS024597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough there are significant demographic and clinical variations in treatment decisions for infants with high-grade hydronephrosis concerning for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), there has been little research on the roles of parents and surgeons in the surgical decision-making (DM) process.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to understand parents' and surgeons' perceived roles in the surgical DM process for infants with high-grade hydronephrosis. STUDY

designSemistructured interviews were conducted with pediatric urologists from three regionally diverse tertiary referral sites and parents of infants diagnosed and treated for unilateral Society for Fetal Urology grade 3 or 4 hydronephrosis at one tertiary pediatric urology practice. Purposive sampling was used to ensure adequate representation of parents based on treatment choice, patient gender, race/ethnicity, and distance from the practice. Survey domains included (1) discussions about diagnosis and treatment options, (2) factors guiding treatment choice, and (3) participants' role in the DM process. Transcribed data and field notes were analyzed using a team-based, inductive grounded theory qualitative approach.

resultsThirteen physicians and 32 parents were interviewed between November 2016 and November 2017. Parents and surgeons agreed that the surgeon was best equipped to guide treatment decisions because of their clinical knowledge and experience. Parents reported that their trust in the surgeon was the primary factor in their decisions. Surgeons reported tailoring discussions with parents to not only educate them about treatment options but also to develop an ongoing relationship with parents. Both parents and surgeons reported being satisfied with their roles in the DM process. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that parental trust in the surgeon and surgeon recommendations drive DM. This may be due to a lack of explicit discussion of options or of parental values and preferences for care. Limited discussions may also impact parental understanding of risks and potential complications. These findings are similar to those of prior studies in adults and children considering elective surgery.

conclusionsIn this study, parents and surgeons reported that surgeon recommendations, rather than parent preferences, guide treatment choices for infants with suspected UPJO. Both parents and surgeons are satisfied with a physician-driven approach to DM, suggesting that, in situations where the perceived risk is low and parental knowledge is limited, parents may find a physician-led approach beneficial. Data gleaned from this study will be used to inform future quantitative studies evaluating factors guiding surgeon recommendations for treatment and their associations with underlying treatment variation.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationUrologistsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantKidney PelvisMaleRetrospective StudiesUreteral ObstructionUrologic Surgical ProceduresHydronephrosisShared decision-makingTreatment variationUPJ obstruction

Identifiers

PMID31239100
PMCPMC6884651
OpenAlexW2946995406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.