Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31238936›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

The co-design, implementation and evaluation of a serious board game 'PlayDecide patient safety' to educate junior doctors about patient safety and the importance of reporting safety concerns.

Marie Ward, Éidín Ní Shé, Aoife De Brún, Christian Korpos, Moayed Hamza, Elaine Burke, Ann Duffy, Karen Egan, Una Geary, Catherine Holland and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis and Patient Safety Culture: A Mixed-Method Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mitigating unintended consequences of co-design in health care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. "I feel I have no voice": hospital doctors' workplace silence in Ireland.Journal of health organization and management · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. "International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co-design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health-care teams.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marie WardSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Éidín Ní ShéSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Aoife De BrúnSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Christian KorposSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Moayed HamzaSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Elaine BurkeSt. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Ann DuffyClinical Risk, State Claims Agency, Grand Canal Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Karen EganPatient Representative, Patient and Public Involvement in Healthcare at Health Service, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Una GearySt. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Catherine HollandMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Julie O'GradySt. James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Karen RobinsonHealth Sciences Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Alan SmithSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Alan WatsonSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Eilish McAuliffeHealth Sciences Centre, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, College of Health Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. eilish.mcauliffe@ucd.ie.

Funding

Health Research Board Medical Education Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe believe junior doctors are in a unique position in relation to reporting of incidents and safety culture. They are still in training and are also 'fresh eyes' on the system providing valuable insights into what they perceive as safe and unsafe behaviour. The aim of this study was to co-design and implement an embedded learning intervention - a serious board game - to educate junior doctors about patient safety and the importance of reporting safety concerns, while at the same time shaping a culture of responsiveness from senior medical staff.

methodsA serious game based on the PlayDecide framework was co-designed and implemented in two large urban acute teaching hospitals. To evaluate the educational value of the game voting on the position statements was recorded at the end of each game by a facilitator who also took notes after the game of key themes that emerged from the discussion. A sample of players were invited on a voluntary basis to take part in semi-structured interviews after playing the game using Flanagan's Critical Incident Technique. A paper-based questionnaire on 'Safety Concerns' was developed and administered to assess pre-and post-playing the game reporting behaviour. Dissemination workshops were held with senior clinicians to promote more inclusive leadership behaviours and responsiveness to junior doctors raising of safety concerns from senior clinicians.

resultsThe game proved to be a valuable patient safety educational tool and proved effective in encouraging deep discussion on patient safety. There was a significant change in the reporting behaviour of junior doctors in one of the hospitals following the intervention.

conclusionIn healthcare, limited exposure to patient safety training and narrow understanding of safety compromise patients lives. The existing healthcare system needs to value the role that junior doctors and others could play in shaping a positive safety culture where reporting of all safety concerns is encouraged. Greater efforts need to be made at hospital level to develop a more pro-active safe and just culture that supports and encourages junior doctors and ultimately all doctors to understand and speak up about safety concerns.

Indexed as

Games, ExperimentalPatient SafetyHospitals, TeachingHumansIrelandMedical Staff, HospitalRole PlayingSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesEmbedded learningJunior doctorsMedical educationPatient safetySafety cultureSerious game

Identifiers

PMID31238936
PMCPMC6593521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.