Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31238906›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2019

Empirical evidence of delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

Segun Bello, Rotimi Felix Afolabi, David Taiwo Ajayi, Tarang Sharma, Deborah Olamiposi Owoeye, Omobola Oduyoye, Joseph Jasanya

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic Yield of Tongue Swab- Compared to Sputum-Based Molecular Testing for Tuberculosis in Four High-Burden Countries.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Segun BelloDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. drsegunbello@yahoo.com.
Rotimi Felix AfolabiDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
David Taiwo AjayiDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Tarang SharmaCochrane, Editorial and Methods Department, Cochrane Central Executive, Cochrane Informatics and Knowledge Management Department Denmark ApS, c/o Rigshospitalet, afd. 7811, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Deborah Olamiposi OwoeyeDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Omobola OduyoyeDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Joseph JasanyaDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis are a major set-back to global tuberculosis control. There is currently no global evidence on the average delays thus, the most important contributor to total delay is unknown. We aimed to estimate average delay measures and to investigate sources for heterogeneity among studies assessing delay measures.

methodsSystematic review of studies reporting mean (± standard deviation) or median (interquartile range, IQR) of patient, doctor, diagnostic, treatment, health system and/or total delays in journal articles indexed in PubMed. We pooled mean delays using random-effects inverse variance meta-analysis, investigated for variations in pooled estimates in subgroup analyses and explored for sources of heterogeneity using pre-specified explanatory variables.

resultsThe systematic review included 198 studies (831,724 patients) from 78 countries. The median number of patients per study was 243 (IQR; 160-458) patients. Overall, the pooled mean total delay was 87.6 (95% CI: 81.4-93.9) days. The most important and largest contributor to total delay was patient delay with a pooled mean delay of 81 (95% CI: 70-92) days followed by doctor's delay and treatment delay with pooled mean delays of 29.5 (95% CI: 25.9-33.0) and 7.9 (95% CI: 6.9-8.9) days respectively. There was considerable heterogeneity in all pooled analyses (I

conclusionStrategies to address patients' delay could have important implications for the success of the global tuberculosis control programmes.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisTime-to-TreatmentEmpirical ResearchHumansTuberculosis, PulmonaryDelayDisease controlDoctorEvidenceHealth systemMeta-regression modelPatientPulmonary tuberculosisTotalTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31238906
PMCPMC6593585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.