Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31238876›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Twiner: correlation-based regularization for identifying common cancer gene signatures.

Marta B Lopes, Sandra Casimiro, Susana Vinga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta B LopesInstituto de Telecomunicações, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal. marta.lopes@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-1857
Sandra CasimiroLuis Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.
Susana VingaINESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Alves Redol 9, Lisboa, 1000-029, Portugal.
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

SENSITIVE PERSONNEL DOSIMETRY OF 3KEV TO 20MEV NEUTRONSR43CA050021 · NCI · ATOM SCIENCES, INC. · PI THONNARD, NORBERT · 1989 to 1989
–
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/CCI-CIF/29877/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/EMS-SIS/0642/2014Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/CEC/50021/2019Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/EEA/50008/2013Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/EMS/50022/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast and prostate cancers are typical examples of hormone-dependent cancers, showing remarkable similarities at the hormone-related signaling pathways level, and exhibiting a high tropism to bone. While the identification of genes playing a specific role in each cancer type brings invaluable insights for gene therapy research by targeting disease-specific cell functions not accounted so far, identifying a common gene signature to breast and prostate cancers could unravel new targets to tackle shared hormone-dependent disease features, like bone relapse. This would potentially allow the development of new targeted therapies directed to genes regulating both cancer types, with a consequent positive impact in cancer management and health economics.

resultsWe address the challenge of extracting gene signatures from transcriptomic data of prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) and breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) samples, particularly estrogen positive (ER+), and androgen positive (AR+) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), using sparse logistic regression. The introduction of gene network information based on the distances between BRCA and PRAD correlation matrices is investigated, through the proposed twin networks recovery (twiner) penalty, as a strategy to ensure similarly correlated gene features in two diseases to be less penalized during the feature selection procedure.

conclusionsOur analysis led to the identification of genes that show a similar correlation pattern in BRCA and PRAD transcriptomic data, and are selected as key players in the classification of breast and prostate samples into ER+ BRCA/AR+ TNBC/PRAD tumor and normal tissues, and also associated with survival time distributions. The results obtained are supported by the literature and are expected to unveil the similarities between the diseases, disclose common disease biomarkers, and help in the definition of new strategies for more effective therapies.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeEstrogensFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrincipal Component AnalysisProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenSurvival AnalysisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsEstrogensReceptors, AndrogenBreast invasive carcinomaGene networkProstate adenocarcinomaSparse logistic regressionTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID31238876
PMCPMC6593597
OpenAlexW2954480978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.