Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31238599›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2019

Relationship between the Position of Impacted Third Molars and External Root Resorption of Adjacent Second Molars: A Retrospective CBCT Study.

Dalia Smailienė, Giedrė Trakinienė, Augustė Beinorienė, Ugnė Tutlienė

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. External root resorption of second molars due to impacted third molars.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dalia SmailienėDepartment of Orthodontics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT- 50106 Kaunas, Lithuania. dsmailiene@gmail.com.
Giedrė TrakinienėDepartment of Orthodontics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT- 50106 Kaunas, Lithuania. gyd_trakiniene@yahoo.com.
Augustė BeinorienėPrivate practice, LT- 50176 Kaunas, Lithuania. auguste.zorskaite@gmail.com.
Ugnė TutlienėDepartment of Orthodontics, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT- 50106 Kaunas, Lithuania. ugne.marmaite@gmail.com.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesImpacted third molars (ITM) are the most commonly-impacted teeth. There is a risk for ITM to cause a number of pathological conditions, and external root resorption (ERR) of adjacent teeth is one of the most prevalent. Retaining or prophylactic extraction of ITM is a polemic topic. External root resorption of adjacent teeth is one of possible indications for prophylactic removal of ITM. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between external root resorption (ERR) on the distal aspect of second molars' roots and positional parameters of ITM. Methods

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMolar, ThirdRetrospective StudiesROC CurveRoot ResorptionTooth, Impactedcone-beam CTexternal root resorptionimpacted third molars

Identifiers

PMID31238599
PMCPMC6631062
OpenAlexW2951869661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.