Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31238399›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2019

Analysis of macular, foveal, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia and their changes following occlusion therapy.

V Kavitha, Mallikarjun M Heralgi, Patel Deep Harishkumar, Sneha Harogoppa, H M Shivaswamy, H Geetha

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in amblyopia.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography findings according to treatment response in patients with amblyopia.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

V KavithaConsultant, Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Harakere, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
Mallikarjun M HeralgiConsultant, Department of Cornea and Refractive Services Sankara Eye Hospital, Harakere, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
Patel Deep HarishkumarRegistrar, Sankara Eye Hospital, Harakere, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
Sneha HarogoppaFellow in Paediatric Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Harakere, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
H M ShivaswamyOptometrist, Sankara Eye Hospital, Harakere, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
H GeethaSchool Screening Project Coordinator, Sankara Eye Hospital, Harakere, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze macular thickness (MT), foveal thickness (FT), and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLT) in children with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia and their changes following occlusion therapy. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal, and comparative study of 60 children aged between 5 and 18 years consisted of two groups, group 1: 30 children with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia; group 2: 30 normal children. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), a detailed ocular examination, spectral domain optical coherence tomography for MT, FT, and RNFLT in both eyes were done at visit one (baseline) and every 3 months for a year following occlusion therapy (initiated one month after first visit) in group 1. Results: Mean BCVA, MT, FT, and RNFLT in amblyopic eyes at first visit were 0.63 ± 0.405, 286.9 ± 6.522 μm, 195.90 ± 8.462 μm, and 100.87 ± 6.240 μm, respectively and at last visit after occlusion therapy were 0.50 ± 0.318, 248.9 ± 11.681 μm, 169.47 ± 10.941 μm, and 99.43 ± 5.722 μm, respectively. At first visit, mean BCVA, MT, FT, and RNFLT in nonamblyopic eyes (group 1) were 0 ± 0, 240 ± 10.447 μm, 159.27 ± 9.285 μm, 98.63 ± 4.723 μm and in normal eyes (group 2: average of right and left eyes) were 0 ± 0, 239.8 ± 4.294 μm, 143.6 ± 4.61 μm, 100.5 ± 2.895 μm, respectively. Conclusion: MT and FT, which were more in amblyopic eyes as compared to normal fellow eyes and group 2, decreased with improvement in BCVA after occlusion therapy. However, there was no difference in RNFLT between amblyopic eyes and normal fellow eyes and group 2 before and after occlusion therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAmblyopiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFovea CentralisHumansMacula LuteaMaleNerve FibersProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsSensory DeprivationTomography, Optical CoherenceAmblyopiafoveal thicknessmacular thicknessocclusion therapyRNFL thicknessSD OCT

Identifiers

PMID31238399
PMCPMC6611253
OpenAlexW2953647936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.