ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2019
Computer-assisted navigation in orbitofacial surgery.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances: Augmented reality, robotics, and navigation in oculoplasty and orbit.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- The Current State of Intraoperative Imaging in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Role of Computer-Assisted Surgery in the Management of Pediatric Orbital Tumors: Insights from a Leading Referral Center.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Patient-Specific Implants in Maxillo-Facial Reconstruction: Current Practices and Way Forward-An Overview of Systematic Reviews.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Review
- Augmented reality and optical navigation assisted orbital surgery: a novel integrated workflow.Innovative surgical sciences · 2025Article
- Microsoft HoloLens 2 vs. tablet-based augmented reality and 3D printing for fronto-orbital reconstruction of craniosynostosis: a case study.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- Transorbital Neuroendoscopic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review for Managing Intracranial Lesions with Orbital Access.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2025Review
- Otolaryngologist surgical preferences for orbital decompression in thyroid eye disease: A North American survey.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- Image-guided orbital surgery: a preclinical validation study using a high-resolution physical model.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- [Robotics and computer-assisted surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review of current studies.Neurosurgical review · 2022Review
- Retrospective Case Analysis of Transnasal Endoscopic Resection of Benign Orbital Apex Tumors: Some Thoughts on Transnasal Endoscopic Surgery.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Image-guided cochlear access by non-invasive registration: a cadaveric feasibility study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Repair of orbital floor fractures via the transantral approach with osteosynthesis plate.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the most common indications, treatment, and outcomes of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in ophthalmological practice. CAS has evolved over the years from a neurosurgical tool to maxillofacial as well as an instrument to orbitofacial surgeries. A detailed and organized scrutiny in relevant electronic databases, journals, and bibliographies of the cited articles was carried out. Clinical studies with a minimum of two study cases were included. Navigation surgery, posttraumatic orbital reconstruction, computer-assisted orbital surgery, image-guided orbital decompression, and optic canal decompression (OCD) were the areas of interest. The search generated 42 articles describing the use of navigation in facial surgery: 22 on orbital reconstructions, 5 related to lacrimal sac surgery, 4 on orbital decompression, 2 articles each on intraorbital foreign body and intraorbital tumors, 2 on faciomaxillary surgeries, 3 on cranial surgery, and 2 articles on navigation-guided OCD in traumatic optic neuropathy. In general, CAS is reported to be a useful tool for surgical planning, execution, evaluation, and research. The largest numbers of studies and patients were related to trauma. Treatment of complex orbital fractures was greatly improved by the use of CAS compared with empirically treated control groups. CAS seems to add a favourable potential to the surgical armamentarium. Planning details of the surgical approach in a three-dimensional virtual environment and execution with real-time guidance can help in considerable enhancement of precision. Financial investments and steep learning curve are the main hindrances to its popularity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.