The two extremes meet: pediatricians, geriatricians and the life-course approach.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Reference centiles for intrinsic capacity throughout adulthood and their association with clinical outcomes: a cross-sectional analysis from the INSPIRE-T cohort.Nature aging · 2023
   Article
2. Implementing care for healthy ageing.BMJ global health · 2022
   Article
3. Good nutrition across the lifespan is foundational for healthy aging and sustainable development.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022
   Article
4. Joint Effort towards Preventing Nutritional Deficiencies at the Extremes of Life during COVID-19.Nutrients · 2021
   Review
5. Musculoskeletal Changes Across the Lifespan: Nutrition and the Life-Course Approach to Prevention.Frontiers in medicine · 2021
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as