ArticleIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Markers of ventricular repolarization as an additional non-invasive electrocardiography parameters for predicting ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in patients with Brugada Syndrome - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrocardiographic Markers Indicating Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Conduction Delay as a Predictor of Major Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Brugada Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Cardiac electrical remodeling in Graves' disease: insights from global ventricular repolarization indices.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Beyond the type 1 pattern: comprehensive risk stratification in Brugada syndrome.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of wearable ECG and assessment of ventricular repolarization and its cardiovascular risks post cold stress.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Tpeak-Tend ECG Marker in Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Scientifica · 2024Review
- Interatrial Block and Electrocardiographic Markers of Repolarization in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Classical and Bayesian Analysis.Medeniyet medical journal · 2023Article
- Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Risk in Paediatric/Young vs. Adult Brugada Syndrome Patients: A Territory-Wide Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundControversies surrounded the management of asymptomatic Brugada syndrome. Prognostication using electrophysiology study (EPS) is disputable. Non-invasive parameters may be a valuable additional tool for risk stratification. We aim to evaluate the use markers of ventricular repolarization including Tpeak-to-Tend (TpTe), Tpe Dispersion, TpTe/QT ratio, and QTc interval as additional non-invasive electrocardiography parameters for predicting ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome.
methodsWe performed a comprehensive search on TpTe, Tpe Dispersion, TpTe/QT ratio, and QTc interval as a predictor for ventricular tachycardia(VT)/fibrillation(VF)/aborted sudden cardiac death/appropriate ICD shock in patients with Brugada syndromes up until October 2018.
resultsWe included ten studies in the qualitative synthesis and eight studies in meta-analysis. There were a total of 2126 subjects from ten studies. We found that TpTe interval (mean difference 11.97 m s [5.02-18.91]; p < 0.001; I
conclusionsMeasurement of TpTe interval, Tp-e dispersion, TpTe/QT ratio, and QTc interval on ECG emerge as a promising prognostication tool which needs further investigations with a more standardized method, outcome, and cut-off points. As for now, only maximum QTc interval has a reliable result with low heterogeneity sufficiently reliable for prognostication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.