Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31238049›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2019

Tailoring the lipid composition of nanoparticles modulates their cellular uptake and affects the viability of triple negative breast cancer cells.

Hanan Abumanhal-Masarweh, Dana da Silva, Maria Poley, Assaf Zinger, Evgenya Goldman, Nitzan Krinsky, Ron Kleiner, Gal Shenbach, Josh E Schroeder, Jeny Shklover and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanan Abumanhal-MasarwehLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel; Russell Berrie Nanotechnology Institute, The Norman Seiden Multidisciplinary Graduate program, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200, Israel.
Dana da SilvaLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Maria PoleyLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Assaf ZingerLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Evgenya GoldmanLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Nitzan KrinskyLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Ron KleinerLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Gal ShenbachLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Josh E SchroederDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Jeny ShkloverLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Janna Shainsky-RoitmanLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Avi SchroederLaboratory for Targeted Drug Delivery and Personalized Medicine Technologies, Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. Electronic address: avids@technion.ac.il.
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILHadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

European Research Council 680242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid nanoparticles are used widely as anticancer drug and gene delivery systems. Internalizing into the target cell is a prerequisite for the proper activity of many nanoparticulate drugs. We show here, that the lipid composition of a nanoparticle affects its ability to internalize into triple-negative breast cancer cells. The lipid headgroup had the greatest effect on enhancing cellular uptake compared to other segments of the molecule. Having a receptor-targeted headgroup induced the greatest increase in cellular uptake, followed by cationic amine headgroups, both being superior to neutral (zwitterion) phosphatidylcholine or to negatively-charged headgroups. The lipid tails also affected the magnitude of cellular uptake. Longer acyl chains facilitated greater liposomal cellular uptake compared to shorter tails, 18:0 > 16:0 > 14:0. When having the same lipid tail length, unsaturated lipids were superior to saturated ones, 18:1 > 18:0. Interestingly, liposomes composed of phospholipids having 14:0 or 12:0-carbon-long-tails, such as DMPC and DLPC, decreased cell viability in a concertation dependent manner, due to a destabilizing effect these lipids had on the cancer cell membrane. Contrarily, liposomes composed of phospholipids having longer carbon tails (16:0 and 18:0), such as DPPC and HSPC, enhanced cancer cell proliferation. This effect is attributed to the integration of the exogenous liposomal lipids into the cancer-cell membrane, supporting the proliferation process. Cholesterol is a common lipid additive in nanoscale formulations, rigidifying the membrane and stabilizing its structure. Liposomes composed of DMPC (14:0) showed increased cellular uptake when enriched with cholesterol, both by endocytosis and by fusion. Contrarily, the effect of cholesterol on HSPC (18:0) liposomal uptake was minimal. Furthermore, the concentration of nanoparticles in solution affected their cellular uptake. The higher the concentration of nanoparticles the greater the absolute number of nanoparticles taken up per cell. However, the efficiency of nanoparticle uptake, i.e. the percent of nanoparticles taken up by cells, decreased as the concentration of nanoparticles increased. This study demonstrates that tuning the lipid composition and concentration of nanoscale drug delivery systems can be leveraged to modulate their cellular uptake.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalEndocytosisLipidsMiceNanoparticlesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsLipidsCancerCell signalingLipidLiposomeMetabolismTargeting

Identifiers

PMID31238049
PMCPMC6660975
OpenAlexW2953212384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.