Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31237941›Full record

SynthesisHealth policy and planning2019

Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh: a systematic review.

Madeleine Dodd, Rebecca Ivers, Anthony B Zwi, Aminur Rahman, Jagnoor Jagnoor

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health policy and planning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Madeleine DoddInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebecca IversInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anthony B ZwiHealth, Rights and Development (HEARD@UNSW), Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aminur RahmanCentre for Injury Prevention and Research (CIPRB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jagnoor JagnoorInjury Division, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, 1 King Street, Newtown, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last four decades, Bangladesh has made considerable improvements in population health, this is in part due to the use of evidence to inform policymaking. This systematic review aims to better understand critical factors that have facilitated the diffusion of scientific evidence into multiple phases of health policymaking in Bangladesh. To do this an existing policy framework designed by Shiffman and Smith in 2007, was used to extract and synthesize data from selected policy analyses. This framework was used to ensure the content, context and actors involved with evidence-informed policymaking were considered in each case where research had helped shape a health policy. The 'PRISMA Checklist' was employed to design pre-specified eligibility criteria for the selection of information sources, search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and process of data extraction and synthesis. Through our systematic search conducted from February to May 2017, we initially identified 1859 articles; after removal of duplicates, followed by the screening of titles, abstracts and full-texts, 24 articles were included in the analysis. Health policy issues included the following topics: maternal and child health, tobacco control, reproductive health, infectious disease control and the impact and sustainability of knowledge translation platforms. Findings suggested that research evidence that could be used to meet key targets associated with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were more likely to be considered as a political (and therefore policy) priority. Furthermore, avenues of engagement between research organizations and the government as well as collective action from civil-society organizations were important for the diffusion of evidence into policies. Through this article, it is apparent that the interface between evidence and policy formulation occurs when evidence is, disseminated by a cohesive policy-network with strong leadership and framed to deliver solutions for problems on both the domestic and global development agenda.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth PolicyOrganizational ObjectivesPolicy MakingBangladeshHumansPopulation HealthQualitative Researchevidence-based policyhealth policyPolicy analysispolicy process

Identifiers

PMID31237941
PMCPMC6736329
OpenAlexW2955862966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.