ArticlePloS one2019
Applicability of propidium monoazide (PMA) for discrimination between living and dead phytoplankton cells.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The performance of different methods in characterizing soil live prokaryotic diversity and abundance is highly variable.iMetaOmics · 2025Article
- Evaluating Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) infection dynamics in rice for distribution routes and environmental reservoirs by molecular approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Propidium Monoazide-Treated, Cell-Direct, Quantitative PCR for Detecting Viable Chloramphenicol-ResistantGenes · 2023Article
- Reconstruction of Archaeal Genomes from Short-Read Metagenomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Rapid determination of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in PCR-positive samples by SDS-PMA assisted RT-qPCR.The Science of the total environment · 2021Article
- Introduction of NGS in Environmental Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infection Control.Microorganisms · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Propidium monoazide (PMA) is a highly selective dye that penetrates only membrane-compromised, dead microbial cells and inhibits both DNA extraction and amplification. PMA has been widely used for discrimination between living and dead microbial cells; however, the application of PMA in phytoplankton studies has been limited. In this study, we attempted to evaluate its applicability for the discrimination of viable phytoplankton. We tested PMA on seven phytoplankton species, Microcystis aeruginosa, Anabaena sp., Aphanizomenon sp., Synechocystis sp., Cryptomonas ovata, Scenedesmus obliquus, and Nitzschia apiculata as representatives of the major phytoplankton taxa Cyanobacteria (first four species), Chlorophyta, Cryptophyta, and Bacillariophyta, respectively. Our results showed that application of PMA to phytoplankton living in freshwater has the potential to distinguish viable from dead cells as in microbial studies. Particularly, PMA differentiated viable from dead cells in cyanobacterial species rather than in other phytoplankton taxa under our experimental conditions. However, our results also showed that it may be necessary to adjust various conditions affecting PMA treatment efficiency to expand its applicability to other phytoplankton. Although all factors contributing to the effects of PMA could not be evaluated, our study showed the applicability of PMA-based molecular approaches, which can be convenient quantitative methods for distinguishing living from dead phytoplankton in freshwater ecosystems. Setting optimal treatment conditions for other phytoplankton species may increase the efficacy of PMA-based molecular approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.