Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31237889›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Do changes in health reveal the possibility of undiagnosed pancreatic cancer? Development of a risk-prediction model based on healthcare claims data.

Aileen Baecker, Sungjin Kim, Harvey A Risch, Teryl K Nuckols, Bechien U Wu, Andrew E Hendifar, Stephen J Pandol, Joseph R Pisegna, Christie Y Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prediction of Pancreatic Cancer in Diabetes Patients with Worsening Glycemic Control.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Early detection of pancreatic cancer.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aileen BaeckerUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Sungjin KimCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Harvey A RischYale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Teryl K NuckolsCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Bechien U WuKaiser Permanente Southern California, Research and Evaluation, Pasadena, CA, United States of America.
Andrew E HendifarCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Stephen J PandolCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Joseph R PisegnaVeterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Christie Y JeonUCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5739-2477

Funding

Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Prevention of Pancreatogenic Diabetes - Administrative SupplementU01DK108314 · NIDDK · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mark Goodarzi, Stephen J. Pandol · 2015 to 2026
$6.1M
Predicting the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by leveraging big dataR21CA220073 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI JEON, CHRISTIE YOUNGHAE · 2018 to 2019
$429k
BLRD VA I01 BX004560NCI NIH HHS R21 CA220073NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK108314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveEarly detection methods for pancreatic cancer are lacking. We aimed to develop a prediction model for pancreatic cancer based on changes in health captured by healthcare claims data.

methodsWe conducted a case-control study on 29,646 Medicare-enrolled patients aged 68 years and above with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) reported to the Surveillance Epidemiology an End Results (SEER) tumor registries program in 2004-2011 and 88,938 age and sex-matched controls. We developed a prediction model using multivariable logistic regression on Medicare claims for 16 risk factors and pre-diagnostic symptoms of PDAC present within 15 months prior to PDAC diagnosis. Claims within 3 months of PDAC diagnosis were excluded in sensitivity analyses. We evaluated the discriminatory power of the model with the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and performed cross-validation by bootstrapping.

resultsThe prediction model on all cases and controls reached AUC of 0.68. Excluding the final 3 months of claims lowered the AUC to 0.58. Among new-onset diabetes patients, the prediction model reached AUC of 0.73, which decreased to 0.63 when claims from the final 3 months were excluded. Performance measures of the prediction models was confirmed by internal validation using the bootstrap method.

conclusionModels based on healthcare claims for clinical risk factors, symptoms and signs of pancreatic cancer are limited in classifying those who go on to diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and those who do not, especially when excluding claims that immediately precede the diagnosis of PDAC.

Indexed as

Health StatusAdenocarcinomaAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPancreatic NeoplasmsUndiagnosed Diseases

Identifiers

PMID31237889
PMCPMC6592596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.