Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31237566›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2019

Preferences of Information Dissemination on Treatment for Bipolar Disorder: Patient-Centered Focus Group Study.

Berit Kerner, Annette S Crisanti, Jason L DeShaw, Janika-Marie G Ho, Kimmie Jordan, Ronald L Krall, Matt J Kuntz, Aurélien J Mazurie, Anastasiya Nestsiarovich, Douglas J Perkins and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02893371 (Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02893371 terminatednot on this map

Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of New MexicoRan2016 to 2019Enrolled1,037,352ConditionsBipolar DisorderArmsLithium Carbonate, Lamotrigine, Valproic Acid, Oxcarbazepine, Carbamazepine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of an Essential Information Set for Supporting Life With Bipolar Disorder: A Modified Delphi Study With Patients, Families and Healthcare Professionals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Berit KernerSemel Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-1116
Annette S CrisantiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-8472
Jason L DeShawNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8785-3441
Janika-Marie G HoBates College, Lewiston, ME, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-8058
Kimmie JordanNational Alliance on Mental Illness New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2573-7466
Ronald L KrallUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-1229
Matt J KuntzNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2897-2103
Aurélien J MazurieTwoFoldChange Consulting, Bozeman, MT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2872-2502
Anastasiya NestsiarovichDivision of Translational Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-2381
Douglas J PerkinsCenter for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-6255
Quentin L SchroeterNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-7924
Alicia N SmithNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-306X
Mauricio TohenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8049-4351
Emma VoleskyNational Alliance on Mental Illness Montana, Helena, MT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0934-5529
Yiliang ZhuDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6403-3050
Christophe G LambertDivision of Translational Informatics, Center for Global Health, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-2893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient education has taken center stage in successfully shared decision making between patients and health care providers. However, little is known about how patients with bipolar disorder typically obtain information on their illness and the treatment options available to them.

objectiveThis study aimed to obtain the perspectives of patients with bipolar disorder and their family members on the preferred and most effectively used information channels on bipolar disorder and the available treatment options.

methodsWe conducted nine focus groups in Montana, New Mexico, and California, in which we surveyed 84 individuals including patients with bipolar disorder and family members of patients with bipolar disorder. The participants were recruited using National Alliance on Mental Illness mailing lists and websites. Written verbatim responses to semistructured questionnaires were analyzed using summative content analysis based on grounded theory. Two annotators coded and analyzed the data on the sentence or phrase level to create themes. Relationships between demographics and information channel were also examined using the Chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

resultsThe focus group participants mentioned a broad range of information channels that were successfully used in the past and could be recommended for future information dissemination. The majority of participants used providers (74%) and internet-based resources (75%) as their main information sources. There was no association between internet use and basic demographics such as age or geographical region of the focus groups. Patients considered time constraints and the fast pace in which an overwhelming amount of information is often presented by the provider as major barriers to successful provider-patient interactions. If Web-based channels were used, the participants perceived information obtained through Web-based channels as more helpful than information received in the provider's office (P<.05).

conclusionsWeb-based resources are increasingly used by patients with bipolar disorder and their family members to educate themselves about the disease and its treatment. Although provider-patient interactions are frequently perceived to be burdened with time constraints, Web-based information sources are considered reliable and helpful. Future research should explore how high-quality websites could be used to empower patients and improve provider-patient interactions with the goal of enhancing shared decision making between patients and providers.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderdecision-makinginformation seekinginternetpatient educationpatient-physician relationshippsychiatrytherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID31237566
PMCPMC6614999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.