Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31237365›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2019

Rhythm in speech and animal vocalizations: a cross-species perspective.

Andrea Ravignani, Simone Dalla Bella, Simone Falk, Christopher T Kello, Florencia Noriega, Sonja A Kotz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rhythm Across Species: Situating Human Speech in a Comparative Framework.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Isochrony in barks of Cape fur seal (Ecology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Musicality in human vocal communication: an evolutionary perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Voice modulatory cues to structure across languages and species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Rhythmic abilities in humans and non-human animals: a review and recommendations from a methodological perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Acoustic information about upper limb movement in voicing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea RavignaniArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Simone Dalla BellaInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Simone FalkInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Christopher T KelloCognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, California.
Florencia NoriegaChair for Network Dynamics, Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden (CFAED), TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sonja A KotzInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions A.R. has received funding from the European UnionNational Science Foundation 1529127National Science Foundation 1633722Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-05453Portuguese Science Foundation S.A.K (Co-PI) was supported by a grant from the Po
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why does human speech have rhythm? As we cannot travel back in time to witness how speech developed its rhythmic properties and why humans have the cognitive skills to process them, we rely on alternative methods to find out. One powerful tool is the comparative approach: studying the presence or absence of cognitive/behavioral traits in other species to determine which traits are shared between species and which are recent human inventions. Vocalizations of many species exhibit temporal structure, but little is known about how these rhythmic structures evolved, are perceived and produced, their biological and developmental bases, and communicative functions. We review the literature on rhythm in speech and animal vocalizations as a first step toward understanding similarities and differences across species. We extend this review to quantitative techniques that are useful for computing rhythmic structure in acoustic sequences and hence facilitate cross-species research. We report links between vocal perception and motor coordination and the differentiation of rhythm based on hierarchical temporal structure. While still far from a complete cross-species perspective of speech rhythm, our review puts some pieces of the puzzle together.

Indexed as

LanguagePeriodicityAnimalsBiological EvolutionHumansSpeechVocalization, Animalbioacousticshierarchicalrhythm cognitionspeech rhythmtime perceptiontiming

Identifiers

PMID31237365
PMCPMC6851814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.