ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Severe Acute Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Effects on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vulnerable struts with CRE8, Biomatrix and Xience stents assessed with OCT and their correlation with clinical variables at 6-month follow-up: the CREBX-OCT study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Trial
- Intracoronary imaging for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC and the European Bifurcation Club (EBC).European heart journal · 2026Article
- Intracoronary imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention: why, when, how and which from large, randomized trials.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Practical Management in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology Expert Consensus for the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Part 2.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Intravascular imaging for acute coronary syndrome.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Long-term Follow-up Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Constructed Based on Patient Plaque and Clinical Features for Predicting Stent Malapposition: A Retrospective Study.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- Clinical Implications of Acute Stent Mal-Apposition in the Left Main Coronary Artery.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- The POT-PUFF sign: an angiographic mark of stent malapposition during proximal optimisation.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Micro Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Malapposition.Korean circulation journal · 2020Review
- Severe Acute Stent Malapposition After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Effects on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The effects of severe acute stent malapposition ( ASM ) after drug-eluting stent implantation on long-term clinical outcomes are not clearly understood. We evaluated long-term clinical outcomes of severe ASM using optical coherence tomography. Methods and Results We pooled patient- and lesion-level data from 6 randomized studies. Five studies investigated follow-up drug-eluting stent strut coverage and one investigated ASM . In this data set, a total of 436 patients with 444 lesions underwent postintervention optical coherence tomography examination and these data were included in the analysis. Severe ASM was defined as lesions with ≥400 μm of maximum malapposed distance or ≥1 mm of maximum malapposed length. Composite events (cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) were compared between patients with and without severe ASM . The postintervention optical coherence tomography findings indicated that 62 (14.2%) patients had lesions with ≥400 μm of maximum malapposed distance and 186 (42.7%) patients had lesions with ≥1 mm of maximum malapposed length. The 5-year clinical follow-up was completed in 371 (86.1%) of the eligible 431 patients. The cumulative rate of composite events was similar among the patients in each group during 5-year follow-up: 3.3% in patients with ASM ≥400 μm of maximum malapposed distance versus 3.1% in those with no ASM or ASM <400 μm of maximum malapposed distance ( P=0.89), and 1.2% in patients with ASM ≥1 mm of maximum malapposed length versus 4.6% in those with no ASM or ASM <1 mm of maximum malapposed length ( P=0.06). Conclusions During the 5-year follow-up, ASM severity was not associated with long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with drug-eluting stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.