ArticleHLA2019
Comparison of sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single-pass high-resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs.
Article in HLA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trivalent mosaic or consensus HIV immunogens prime humoral and broader cellular immune responses in adults.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Trial
- Genetic Risk in Multiple Sclerosis: Susceptibility, Modifiers and Unresolved Questions.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- The digital keystone: how artificial intelligence is reshaping HLA research and clinical practice.Immunogenetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Strategies for neoantigen screening and immunogenicity validation in cancer immunotherapy (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Associations of HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles with cardiovascular disease and events in a multi-ethnic community-living population: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).Human immunology · 2025Article
- Large-scale statistical mapping of T-cell receptorFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Optimized multiplex PCR-NGS for comprehensive HLA genotyping in Chinese populations: resolving ambiguities at high resolution.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Effects ofOpen life sciences · 2025Article
- Improving long-term kidney allograft survival by rethinking HLA compatibility: from molecular matching to non-HLA genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Advancements in HLA Typing Techniques and Their Impact on Transplantation Medicine.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024Review
- Tutorial: a statistical genetics guide to identifying HLA alleles driving complex disease.Nature protocols · 2023Review
- High-Resolution Genotyping of Expressed Equine MHC Reveals a Highly Complex MHC Structure.Genes · 2023Article
- Development of a high-resolution mass-spectrometry-based method and software for human leukocyte antigen typing.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Extended genomic HLA typing identifies previously unrecognized mismatches in living kidney transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Novel alleles in the era of next-generation sequencing-based HLA typing calls for standardization and policy.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Technical and clinical aspects of the histocompatibility crossmatch assay in solid organ transplantationBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2022Article
- Benchmarking of 5 algorithms for high-resolution genotyping of human leukocyte antigen class I genes from blood and tissue samples.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Chimerism analysis for clinicians: a review of the literature and worldwide practices.Bone marrow transplantation · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence-specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high-resolution data, Sanger sequencing-based typing (SBT) has been the "gold standard." However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high-resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three-field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single-pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.