Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31237115›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2019

Comprehensive proteogenomic analysis of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells.

Elvira Immacolata Parrotta, Stefania Scalise, Domenico Taverna, Maria Teresa De Angelis, Gianmarco Sarro, Marco Gaspari, Gianluca Santamaria, Giovanni Cuda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elvira Immacolata ParrottaResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8145-3623
Stefania ScaliseResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Domenico TavernaResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Maria Teresa De AngelisResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Gianmarco SarroResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Marco GaspariResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Gianluca SantamariaResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9284-7492
Giovanni CudaResearch Center for Advanced Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the concepts of somatic cell reprogramming and human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) generation have undergone several analyses to validate the usefulness of these cells in research and clinic, it remains still controversial whether the hiPSCs are equivalent to human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), pointing to the need of further characterization for a more comprehensive understanding of pluripotency. Most of the experimental evidence comes from the transcriptome analysis, while a little is available on protein data, and even less is known about the post-translational modifications. Here, we report a combined strategy of mass spectrometry and gene expression profiling for proteogenomic analysis of reprogrammed and embryonic stem cells. The data obtained through this integrated, multi-"omics" approach indicate that a small, but still significant, number of distinct pathways is enriched in reprogrammed versus embryonic stem cells, supporting the view that pluripotency is an extremely complex, multifaceted phenomenon, with peculiarities that are characteristic of each cell type.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingFibroblastsGene Expression ProfilingHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMass SpectrometryProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteogenomicsTranscriptomehuman embryonic stem cells (hESCs)human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)mass spectrometrypluripotencypost-translational modificationsproteometranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31237115
PMCPMC6653499
OpenAlexW2956142603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.