ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Probing chemical exchange using quantitative spin-lock R
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative macromolecular proton fraction imaging using pulsed spin-lock.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Novel spin-lock time sampling strategies for improved reproducibility in quantitative T1ρ mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCEST is commonly used to probe the effects of chemical exchange. Although R
methodsBloch-McConnell simulations were used to verify the analytical formula derived for the optimal spin-lock RF pulse B
resultsThe analytical prediction of the optimal B
conclusionThe AC-iTIP approach could probe the chemical exchange effect more robustly than the existing R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.