Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236900›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2020

A novel virtual-reality-based route-learning test suite: Assessing the effects of cognitive aging on navigation.

Jan M Wiener, Denise Carroll, Stacey Moeller, Iram Bibi, Dima Ivanova, Peter Allen, Thomas Wolbers

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04331392 (Remotely Delivered Environmental Enrichment Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04331392 narecruitingnot on this map

Remotely Delivered Environmental Enrichment Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Rehabilitation InstituteRan2018 to 2027Enrolled84ConditionsBrain Injuries, Traumatic, Brain Injury Traumatic Severe, Brain Injury Traumatic Moderate, Brain Injury, ChronicArmsSpatial Navigation Intervention, Educational Videos
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Designing for Wayfinding in VR: Linking Navigation Interfaces to Spatial Learning and Cognitive Mapping.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Virtual Reality for Spatial Navigation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan M WienerDepartment of Psychology, Ageing and Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK. jwiener@bournemouth.ac.uk.
Denise CarrollDepartment of Psychology, Ageing and Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Stacey MoellerMesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Iram BibiDepartment of Psychology, Ageing and Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Dima IvanovaDepartment of Psychology, Ageing and Dementia Research Centre, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Peter AllenDepartment of Creative Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.
Thomas WolbersGerman Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most research groups studying human navigational behavior with virtual environment (VE) technology develop their own tasks and protocols. This makes it difficult to compare results between groups and to create normative data sets for any specific navigational task. Such norms, however, are prerequisites for the use of navigation assessments as diagnostic tools-for example, to support the early and differential diagnosis of atypical aging. Here we start addressing these problems by presenting and evaluating a new navigation test suite that we make freely available to other researchers (https://osf.io/mx52y/). Specifically, we designed three navigational tasks, which are adaptations of earlier published tasks used to study the effects of typical and atypical aging on navigation: a route-repetition task that can be solved using egocentric navigation strategies, and route-retracing and directional-approach tasks that both require allocentric spatial processing. Despite introducing a number of changes to the original tasks to make them look more realistic and ecologically valid, and therefore easy to explain to people unfamiliar with a VE or who have cognitive impairments, we replicated the findings from the original studies. Specifically, we found general age-related declines in navigation performance and additional specific difficulties in tasks that required allocentric processes. These findings demonstrate that our new tasks have task demands similar to those of the original tasks, and are thus suited to be used more widely.

Indexed as

Cognitive AgingSpatial NavigationVirtual RealityAgingHumansLearningNeuropsychological TestsCognitive agingNavigationNavigation testRoute learning

Identifiers

PMID31236900
PMCPMC7148270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.