Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236829›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2019

High Pressure Nebulization (PIPAC) Versus Injection for the Intraperitoneal Administration of mRNA Complexes.

Molood Shariati, Heyang Zhang, Leen Van de Sande, Benedicte Descamps, Chris Vanhove, Wouter Willaert, Wim Ceelen, Stefaan C De Smedt, Katrien Remaut

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. mRNA Vaccine Era-Mechanisms, Drug Platform and Clinical Prospection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Molood ShariatiLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Heyang ZhangLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Leen Van de SandeCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Benedicte DescampsDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Chris VanhoveDepartment of Electronics and Information Systems, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Wouter WillaertCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Wim CeelenCancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
Stefaan C De SmedtLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Stefaan.Desmedt@UGent.be.
Katrien RemautLaboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Katrien.Remaut@UGent.be.
Cancer Research Institute Ghent · BEGhent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek research project G006714NH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions No. 676137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel technique delivering drugs into the abdominal cavity as an aerosol under high pressure. It is hypothesized to have advantages such as enhancing tissue uptake, distributing drugs homogeneously within the closed and expanded abdominal cavity and higher local concentration of drugs in the peritoneal cavity. However, the clinical trials of PIPAC so far are limited to liquid chemotherapeutic solution, and the applicability of biomolecules (such as mRNA, siRNA and oligonucleotide) is not known. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of administrating mRNA lipoplexes to the peritoneal cavity via high pressure nebulization.

methodsWe firstly investigated the influences of nebulization on physicochemical properties and in vitro transfection efficiency of mRNA lipoplexes. Then, mRNA lipoplexes were delivered to healthy rats through intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and PIPAC, respectively.

resultsmRNA lipoplexes can withstand the high pressure applied during the PIPAC procedure in vitro. Bioluminescence localized to the peritoneal cavity of rats after administration by IP injection and nebulization, while intravenous injection mainly induced protein expression in the spleen.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that local nebulization is feasible to apply mRNA complexes in the peritoneal cavity during a PIPAC procedure.

Indexed as

AerosolsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDrug CompoundingFeasibility StudiesHumansInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, IntravenousLipidsLiposomesNanoparticlesNebulizers and VaporizersPeritoneal CavityPressureRats, NudeRNA, MessengerAerosolsLipidsLipofectamineLiposomesRNA, Messengerintraperitoneal administrationmRNA nanoparticlesnebulizationperitoneal carcinomatosis

Identifiers

PMID31236829
OpenAlexW2953972631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.