Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236819›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Between-hospital variation in mortality and survival after glioblastoma surgery in the Dutch Quality Registry for Neuro Surgery.

Philip C De Witt Hamer, Vincent K Y Ho, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Linda Ackermans, Hilko Ardon, Sytske Boomstra, Wim Bouwknegt, Wimar A van den Brink, Clemens M Dirven, Niels A van der Gaag and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05318612 (), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05318612 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

(Cost)Effectiveness of MR-guided LITT Therapy in Patients With Primary Irresectable Glioblastoma: a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (EMITT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2022 to 2027Enrolled238ConditionsPrimary GlioblastomaArmsLaser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT), Biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Philip C De Witt HamerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.dewitthamer@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2988-8544
Vincent K Y HoNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aeilko H ZwindermanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda AckermansDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hilko ArdonDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Sytske BoomstraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Wim BouwknegtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Slotervaart, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wimar A van den BrinkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Clemens M DirvenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels A van der GaagHAGA Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Olivier van der VeerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Albert J S IdemaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Alfred KloetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Jan KoopmansDepartment of Neurosurgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mark Ter LaanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marco J T VerstegenLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michiel WagemakersDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pierre A J T RobeDepartment of Neurology & Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Quality Registry Neuro Surgery glioblastoma working group from the Dutch Society of Neurosurgery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStandards for surgical decisions are unavailable, hence treatment decisions can be personalized, but also introduce variation in treatment and outcome. National registrations seek to monitor healthcare quality. The goal of the study is to measure between-hospital variation in risk-standardized survival outcome after glioblastoma surgery and to explore the association between survival and hospital characteristics in conjunction with patient-related risk factors.

methodsData of 2,409 adults with first-time glioblastoma surgery at 14 hospitals were obtained from a comprehensive, prospective population-based Quality Registry Neuro Surgery in The Netherlands between 2011 and 2014. We compared the observed survival with patient-specific risk-standardized expected early (30-day) mortality and late (2-year) survival, based on age, performance, and treatment year. We analyzed funnel plots, logistic regression and proportional hazards models.

resultsOverall 30-day mortality was 5.2% and overall 2-year survival was 13.5%. Median survival varied between 4.8 and 14.9 months among hospitals, and biopsy percentages ranged between 16 and 73%. One hospital had lower than expected early mortality, and four hospitals had lower than expected late survival. Higher case volume was related with lower early mortality (P = 0.031). Patient-related risk factors (lower age; better performance; more recent years of treatment) were significantly associated with longer overall survival. Of the hospital characteristics, longer overall survival was associated with lower biopsy percentage (HR 2.09, 1.34-3.26, P = 0.001), and not with academic setting, nor with case volume.

conclusionsHospitals vary more in late survival than early mortality after glioblastoma surgery. Widely varying biopsy percentages indicate treatment variation. Patient-related factors have a stronger association with overall survival than hospital-related factors.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHospital MortalityHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNeurosurgical ProceduresProspective StudiesRegistriesSurvival RateGlioblastomaMortalityNeurosurgical proceduresOutcome assessmentQuality of health careSurvival

Identifiers

PMID31236819
PMCPMC6700042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.