Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236812›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2019

Role of docosahexaenoic acid in enhancement of docetaxel action in patient-derived breast cancer xenografts.

Marnie Newell, Susan Goruk, Vera Mazurak, Lynne Postovit, Catherine J Field

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Promising Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marnie NewellDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 4-031 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Susan GorukDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 4-031 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Vera MazurakDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 4-002A Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Lynne PostovitDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 5-142E Katz Group Centre for Research, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada.
Catherine J FieldDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 4-126A Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada. Catherine.field@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-7698
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research RES0037745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to investigate if DHA dietary supplementation enhances the anticancer actions of docetaxel (TXT) in two different drug resistant triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenografts (PDX)s.

methodsIn two experiments, female NSG mice bearing TNBC PDXs were randomized to one of two nutritionally adequate diets (20% w/w): control (0% DHA), or DHA (3.9% w/w of total fat) and injected with 0 or 5 mg/kg TXT, twice weekly for 6 weeks (n = 8 per group). Treatment response was determined by significant differences in tumor weight, and apoptotic, proliferation and cell cycle markers at endpoint.

resultsMice bearing MAXF574 xenografts fed DHA diet and treated with TXT had a 57% reduction in tumor weight compared to mice fed control diet (P < 0.004), a 64% reduction compared to control + TXT (P < 0.01) and a 34% reduction compared to DHA with no TXT (P < 0.04). DHA + TXT reduced MAXF401 xenografts growth compared to control and control + TXT (by 43% and 34%, respectively, P < 0.05). In both xenografts, DHA + TXT resulted in a higher expression of proapoptotic proteins Ripk1 and Bid, lower expression of proliferation marker Ki67 and anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Parp, and a greater increase in cell cycle arrest as measured by decreased Survivin expression when compared to control + TXT mice (P < 0.05).

conclusionsThis work is the first to confirm that DHA supplementation during chemotherapy treatment improves TXT action in two PDX models of TNBC. The results suggest that decreases in tumor size occurred via changes in apoptosis, cell proliferation, and cell cycle pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBreast NeoplasmsCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDietary SupplementsDisease Models, AnimalDocetaxelDocosahexaenoic AcidsDrug SynergismFemaleHumansMiceSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelDocosahexaenoic AcidsApoptosisCell cycleFatty acidsKi67Tumor growth

Identifiers

PMID31236812
OpenAlexW2954586745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.