Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236771›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2019

An Update on Pediatric Cardiomyopathy.

Swati Choudhry, Kriti Puri, Susan W Denfield

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pediatric restrictive cardiomyopathy: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Swati ChoudhryDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. sxchoudh@texaschildrens.org.
Kriti PuriDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Susan W DenfieldDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarizes the clinical characteristics and updated outcomes of primary pediatric cardiomyopathies including dilated (DCM), hypertrophic (HCM), and restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), and briefly discusses left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC) and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), primarily arrythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). RECENT

findingsPediatric cardiomyopathies are diseases of the heart muscle with an estimated annual incidence of 1.1-1.5 cases per 100,000. They are progressive in nature and are frequently caused by a genetic mutation causing a structural abnormality in the myocyte. Dilated cardiomyopathy, characterized by left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction with normal left ventricular wall thickness, accounts for about 50-60% of all pediatric cardiomyopathy cases. This is followed by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy accounting for about 40%, characterized by abnormally thickened myocardium in the absence of another cause of hypertrophy with non-dilated left ventricle. Left ventricular non-compaction and restrictive cardiomyopathy each account for about 5% of the cases. Genetic mutations play a dominant role in the development of pediatric cardiomyopathies. While treatment for congestive heart failure and arrhythmias alleviates symptoms, it has not been shown to reduce the risk of sudden death. The 5-year transplant-free survival of DCM, HCM, RCM, and LVNC are 50%, 90%, 30%, and 60% respectively. Pediatric cardiomyopathies while not common they are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in afflicted children. Dilated forms are the most common followed by hypertrophic, left ventricular non-compaction, and restrictive cardiomyopathies. Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies tend to be diagnosed later in the teenage years. Treatment typically follows adult recommendations for which there is significantly more data on treatment benefits, although the indications for ICD placement in children remain even less clear, other than for secondary prevention.

Indexed as

DilatedHeart failureHypertrophicNon-compactionPediatric cardiomyopathyRestrictive

Identifiers

PMID31236771
OpenAlexW2954553880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.