ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2019
Changes in endophytic bacterial communities during different growth stages of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diversity of Endophytes ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The host sex contributes to the endophytic bacterial community inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Changes in the Endophytic Bacterial Community ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparative metataxonamic analyses of seeds and leaves of traditional varieties and hybrids of cucumber (Heliyon · 2023Article
- Characterization of the Non-rhizobial Bacterial Community in the Nodule-Associated Soils of Akebono Soybeans and Isolation of Antibiotic ProducingIndian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Diversity and Taxonomic Distribution of Endophytic Bacterial Community in the Rice Plant and Its Prospective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endophytic bacterial diversity in plants presents the level of interaction between culturable and non-culturable endophytic bacteria, thereby providing an appropriate insight into the endophytic environment. This study was conducted to determine the trend of culturable and non-culturable endophytic bacteria at two different sites encompassing four consecutive growth stages. For culturable endophytic bacteria, isolation was carried out using the dilution plate technique, and the obtained colonies were compared using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Different RFLP-types were identified to their nearest neighbour using 16S rRNA sequencing. The non-culturable endophytic bacterial diversity was obtained by next generation sequencing. Results suggested a similar trend among the culturable and non-culturable bacteria for observed operational taxonomic units and diversity indices. It is noticeable that the endophytic bacteria inhabiting in stage 1 disappeared, and instead, different endophytic bacteria appeared. Moreover, the temporal persistence of certain culturable and non-culturable bacteria was also observed. In conclusion, the endophytic bacterial diversity in cucumber initially increased with the plant growth and then decreased at a later stage. Furthermore, it was suggested that plants regulate the number and diversity of endophytes throughout the lifecycle of plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31236765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.