Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236716›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019

Updates on Management of Gastric Cancer.

Fabian M Johnston, Michael Beckman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 294 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
294citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
37.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

294 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 509 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Silencing of MAT2A inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion through activation of the p53 pathway.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

234 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian M JohnstonSection of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe Street/Blalock 606, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. fjohnst4@jhmi.edu.
Michael BeckmanDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street/Blalock 665, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Johns Hopkins Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGastric adenocarcinoma is the fifth most common and the third most lethal cancer worldwide. Surgery is the only chance of cure, but recurrence is common, even with complete resection. RECENT

findingsAdvances in diagnosis and staging, genomic classification, surgical resection and treatment of peritoneal disease, systemic chemotherapy and chemoradiation, and targeted and immune therapies have led to the current multidisciplinary approach to gastric adenocarcinoma. Treatment of gastric cancer is rapidly evolving in an effort to combat this challenging disease.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantGeneral SurgeryHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCYTO-CHIPFLOTGastric adenocarcinomaGastric cancerHIPECSiewert type III

Identifiers

PMID31236716
OpenAlexW2951091238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.