Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236701›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Analysis of Lipiodol uptake in angiography and computed tomography for the diagnosis of malignant versus benign hepatocellular nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Marcel C Langenbach, Thomas J Vogl, Isabelle von den Driesch, Benjamin Kaltenbach, Jan-Erik Scholtz, Renate M Hammerstingl, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Expert consensus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of liver nodules (version 2026)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcel C LangenbachInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. marcel.langenbach@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8168-2714
Thomas J VoglInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Isabelle von den DrieschInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Benjamin KaltenbachInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jan-Erik ScholtzInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Renate M HammerstinglInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Tatjana Gruber-RouhInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

Guerbet GmbH n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic value of Lipiodol distribution in angiography and CT to differentiate between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and benign nodules of LI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions observed in MRI of liver cirrhosis.

methodsThis retrospective study included all patients with liver cirrhosis who had diagnosis of LI-RADS 3 or 4 lesions by MRI who underwent a Lipiodol-based angiography and post-interventional unenhanced CT- and liver biopsy. Two independent radiologists evaluated appearance, contrast enhancement, Lipiodol uptake in angiography, and morphological parameters (size, form, and density) of the lesions in unenhanced post-angiography CT. α-Fetoprotein (AFP) levels and pre-existing liver conditions were additionally taken into consideration. Differences between HCC lesions and benign nodules were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

resultsOf 60 patients (men, n = 42 [70.0%]; women, 18 [30.0%]; mean age, 61 ± 9.1 years) 36 (60.0%) had HCC and 24 (40.0%) benign nodules. Clear visibility in angiography (sensitivity [se], 100%; specificity [sp], 87.5%) with homogeneous or lacunar Lipiodol enhancement (se, 86.1%; sp, 100%) in consecutive CT can be diagnosed as HCC lesions in cirrhotic liver. Lesion form (p < 0.001), round or oval, and intense contrast (p < 0.001) are minor features which can facilitate the findings. Furthermore, patients with HCC showed a larger lesion size in CT (p = 0.026).

conclusionClearly detectable lesions in Lipiodol-based angiography and a homogeneous or lacunar enhancement in post-angiographic non-contrast CT allow for differentiation of intrahepatic lesions classified as LI-RADS 3 or 4 into benign vs. malign liver lesions with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with liver cirrhosis. Definite diagnosis may not require an additional biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Combination of clear visibility in Lipiodol-based angiography and homogeneous or lacunar enhancement in following native CT scan is HCC-defining. • In lesions classified with MRI as LI-RADS 3 or 4, evaluation based on Lipiodol angiography and following plain CT performed is highly sensitive and specific for the differentiation between HCC and benign nodules in a cirrhotic liver. • The results lead to an alternative pathway in the diagnosis of HCC in cirrhotic liver without the need of an additional liver biopsy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAngiographyCarcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaEthiodized OilFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image EnhancementRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaEthiodized OilAngiographyCarcinoma, hepatocellularEthiodized oilLiver cirrhosisTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID31236701
OpenAlexW2950965832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.