Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236682›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2019

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bioactive glass in posterior cervical and lumbar spinal fusion.

Cédric Barrey, Théo Broussolle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Synthetic osteobiologics in spine surgery: a review.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ceramic Biologics for Bony Fusion-a Journey from First to Third Generations.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cédric BarreyDepartment of Spine Surgery, P. Wertheimer University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France. c.barrey@wanadoo.fr.
Théo BroussolleDepartment of Spine Surgery, P. Wertheimer University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpinal surgery of degenerative painful segments is a valuable treatment option in the management of chronic cervical and low back pain. The surgery consists in stabilizing and fusing painful vertebral segment(s). The objective of the study was to report our experience with 45S5 bioactive glass (BAG) to obtain inter-vertebral fusion in the context of posterior spine surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodIn this retrospective study, 30 patients with a wide range of degenerative and traumatic conditions of the cervical or lumbar spine underwent spinal fusion utilizing a synthetic bone graft substitute of BAG (GlassBone™, Noraker, Lyon-Villeurbanne, France). The pain was evaluated by VAS score, and graft consolidation was assessed on according radiographic images at 1-year post-op.

resultsAll patients underwent posterior spinal fusion either in the cervical or the thoraco-lumbar spine. Multi-level fusions represented the majority of the cohort (43% of patients with more than seven levels treated). Radiographic imaging demonstrated excellent fusion rates (93%) at final follow-up, equivalent to the outcomes reported in the literature for autogenous bone, with excellent bone bridging and no spinal implant loosening. Only two cases of non-union were encountered. Additionally, 90% of the patients demonstrated recovery at 1 year after surgery with a pain reduction of 60%.

conclusionThe results of this retrospective study suggest that the 45S5 BAG may be an interesting alternative option to autologous graft, in terms of safety and bone fusion efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Retrospective study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone SubstitutesCeramicsCervical VertebraeChronic PainFemaleGlassHumansLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective Studiesbioactive glass 45S5Bone SubstitutesBioactive glassBone graftSpinal fusionSpinal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.