ReviewParasite epidemiology and control2019
Status of
Review in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global status of neglected human Linguatula infection: a systematic review of published case reports.Parasitology research · 2021Pooled it
- Assessing the Prevalence and Histopathology of Linguatula serrata Infection of Camels and Cattle in Zabol County, Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- Exploring the anatomy ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024Article
- Cancerogenic parasites in veterinary medicine: a narrative literature review.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Review
- Article
- Meat-borne parasites in the Arab world: a review in a One Health perspective.Parasitology research · 2021Review
- Clinical manifestation and epidemiological findings of humanJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe present systematic review attempted to determine the prevalence of
methodsMEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched from Nov 1996 to 22 Apr 2019 by searching terms including "
resultsBy random effects model analysis, the pooled prevalence of linguatulosis was 25% (95%CI: 18.0-33.0,
conclusionsWe concluded that the high prevalence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.