Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236477›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Assessment of Ophthalmology Residency Programs in Saudi Arabia: A Trainee-Based Survey.

Saad H AlEnezi, Abdullah M Alfawaz, Adi Mohammed Al Owaifeer, Saad M Althiabi, Khalid F Tabbara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Resident's preparedness for independent practice following Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery residency program: a cross-sectional survey.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Research productivity of ophthalmology residents in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive analysis.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Variability of ophthalmology residents' perception toward different major training programs in Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saad H AlEneziDepartment of Ophthalmology, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1294-0211
Abdullah M AlfawazDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Adi Mohammed Al OwaifeerDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Faisal University, Al-Hasa, Saudi Arabia.
Saad M AlthiabiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid F TabbaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the satisfaction and competency of Saudi ophthalmology residents and compare their performance against International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) standards.

methodsA cross-sectional web-based survey of senior ophthalmology residents (postgraduate years [PGY] 3-4) and recent graduates (from 2010 to 2015) assessed various aspects of training. The questionnaire was sent to the participants and was divided into 3 main domains: demographics, training program evaluation, and preparedness for board exams and clinical practice.

resultsOut of the 145 invitees, 120 (82.8%) responded. Fifty percent of respondents reported an overall satisfaction with the program. Adequate clinical exposure was reported in most subspecialties except refraction and low vision rehabilitation with inadequate exposure reported by 55.8% and 95.8%, respectively. Surgical exposure was reported as adequate for phacoemulsification (58.3%) and strabismus surgery (68.3%) only. Eighty-nine percent of respondents reported performing less than 80 cases of phacoemulsification. Of the respondents who had graduated, most (89.7%) passed the final board exam at the first attempt. There were 73.5% of respondents who reported that residency training prepared them well for the board exam. Ongoing clinical and call duties were reported as having a negative impact on exam performance.

conclusionsSaudi ophthalmology residents demonstrate a high level of clinical competency. However, additional efforts should aim at improving surgical training to increase the level of satisfaction among residents and improve the quality of training to meet international standards.

Indexed as

ophthalmologyresidency trainingsurvey

Identifiers

PMID31236477
PMCPMC6572882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.