Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236235›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Postrelease monitoring habitat selection by reintroduced burchell's zebra and blue wildebeest in southern Mozambique.

Luís Comissário Mandlate, Ezidio da Lucia Cuamba, Flávio H G Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Preferred Habitat of Reintroduced Banteng (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luís Comissário MandlateDepartment of General Biology, Postgraduate Programme in Ecology, Conservation and Wildlife Management, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG Belo Horizonte Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3731-0961
Ezidio da Lucia CuambaDepartment of Botanic, Faculty of Natural Sciences Universidade Lúrio Pemba Mozambique.
Flávio H G RodriguesDepartment of General Biology, Postgraduate Programme in Ecology, Conservation and Wildlife Management, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG Belo Horizonte Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn Africa, reintroduction of wild animal species to conservation areas is a common practice, for the recovery or restoration of populations. Effective monitoring of reintroduced species requires understanding of basic ecological requirements such as habitat selection of these species in the new environment. Therefore, the present study investigated the habitat selection of zebra and wildebeest following their reintroduction into Maputo Special Reserve, south Mozambique, and we use binary logistic analyses to investigate the relative influence of biotic and abiotic factors in determining the habitat use. LOCATION: Maputo Special Reserve, south Mozambique.

methodsWe conducted the study from July 2016 to June 2017. The data were collected by direct observation, driving the vehicle along the reserve's roads that covered the vegetation communities where zebras and wildebeest are known to commonly occur. Habitat selection was calculated using selection indices (Manly's alpha), and binary logistic analyses were used to investigate the relative influence of biotic and abiotic factors in determining the habitat use.

resultsThe arboreal savanna was the preferred habitat by both herbivore species. Habitat use of zebra appeared to be strongly determined by characteristics such as high grass cover, high grass greenness, and distance to water, while the habitat use by wildebeest, was strongly affected by grass height. MAIN

conclusionsBoth zebra and wildebeest prefer arboreal savanna, forage selection likely drove preference of this habitat. Greater grass cover and greater percentage greenness of the grass both significantly increased the odds of zebra use of habitat, whereas the odds of use decreased with increases in distance to water, meaning an opportunity to ingest large amounts of grass biomass with higher quality, and this opportunity decreases with increasing in distance to water. Grass height was in the highest-ranking model predicting habitat use by wildebeest, and during the dry season the use of habitat increased with increasing grass height, suggesting that selecting areas with tall grasses by wildebeest equated to choosing areas with higher grass quantity, as the food intake rate increases with grass height.

Indexed as

habitatreintroducedwildebeestzebra

Identifiers

PMID31236235
PMCPMC6580300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.