Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236233›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Replanting of first-cycle oil palm results in a second wave of biodiversity loss.

Adham Ashton-Butt, Simon Willcock, Dedi Purnomo, Suhardi, Anak A K Aryawan, Resti Wahyuningsih, Mohammad Naim, Guy M Poppy, Jean-Pierre Caliman, Kelvin S-H Peh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Riparian buffers made of mature oil palms have inconsistent impacts on oil palm ecosystems.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adham Ashton-ButtDepartment of Biological and Marine Sciences University of Hull Hull UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-6099
Simon WillcockSchool of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.
Dedi PurnomoSMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
SuhardiSMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
Anak A K AryawanSMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
Resti WahyuningsihSMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
Mohammad NaimSMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
Guy M PoppySchool of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.
Jean-Pierre CalimanSMART Research Institute (SMARTRI) Riau Indonesia.
Kelvin S-H PehSchool of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-1341
Jake L SnaddonSchool of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversion of forest to oil palm plantations results in a significant loss of biodiversity. Despite this, first-cycle oil palm plantations can sustain relatively high biodiversity compared to other crops. However, the long-term effects of oil palm agriculture on flora and fauna are unknown. Oil palm has a 25-year commercial lifespan before it must be replanted, due to reduced productivity and difficulty of harvesting. Loss of the complex vegetation structure of oil palm plantations during the replanting process will likely have impacts on the ecosystem at a local and landscape scale. However, the effect of replanting on biodiversity is poorly understood.Here, we investigate the effects of replanting oil palm on soil macrofauna communities. We assessed ordinal richness, abundance, and community composition of soil macrofauna in first- (25- to 27-year-old) and second-cycle oil palm (freshly cleared, 1-year-old, 3-year-old, and 7-year-old mature).Macrofauna abundance and richness drastically declined immediately after replanting. Macrofauna richness showed some recovery 7 years after replanting, but was still 19% lower than first-cycle oil palm. Macrofauna abundance recovered to similar levels to that of first-cycle oil palm plantations, 1 year after replanting. This was mainly due to high ant abundance, possibly due to the increased understory vegetation as herbicides are not used at this age. However, there were subsequent declines in macrofauna abundance 3 and 7 years after replanting, resulting in a 59% drop in macrofauna abundance compared to first-cycle levels. Furthermore, soil macrofauna community composition in all ages of second-cycle oil palm was different to first-cycle plantations, with decomposers suffering particular declines.After considerable biodiversity loss due to forest conversion for oil palm, belowground invertebrate communities suffer a second wave of biodiversity loss due to replanting. This is likely to have serious implications for soil invertebrate diversity and agricultural sustainability in oil palm landscapes, due to the vital ecosystem functions that soil macrofauna provide.

Indexed as

agriculturebelowgroundecosystem functioninvertebrateMacrofaunasoilsustainability

Identifiers

PMID31236233
PMCPMC6580429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.