Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236108›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2019

Facing High EEG Signals Variability during Classification Using Fractal Dimension and Different Cutoff Frequencies.

R Salazar-Varas, Roberto A Vazquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R Salazar-VarasEscuela de Ingeniería, Universidad de las Americas Puebla, Sta. Catarina Mártir, Puebla, CP 72810 San Andrés Cholula, Mexico.
Roberto A VazquezIntelligent Systems Group, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad La Salle México, Benjamin Franklin 45, Col. Condesa, CP 06140 Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7645-4610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the development of a brain-computer interface (BCI), some issues should be regarded in order to improve its reliability and performance. Perhaps, one of the most challenging issues is related to the high variability of the brain signals, which directly impacts the accuracy of the classification. In this sense, novel feature extraction techniques should be explored in order to select those able to face this variability. Furthermore, to improve the performance of the selected feature extraction technique, the parameters of the filter applied in the preprocessing stage need to be properly selected. Then, this work presents an analysis of the robustness of the fractal dimension as feature extraction technique under high variability of the EEG signals, particularly when the training data are recorded one day and the testing data are obtained on a different day. The results are compared with those obtained by an autoregressive model, which is a technique commonly used in BCI applications. Also, the effect of properly selecting the cutoff frequencies of the filter in the preprocessing stage is evaluated. This research is supported by several experiments carried out using a public data set from the BCI international competition, specifically data set 2a from BCIIC IV, related to motor tasks. By a statistical test, it is demonstrated that the performance achieved using the fractal dimension is significantly better than that reached by the AR model. Also, it is demonstrated that the selection of the appropriate cutoff frequencies improves significantly the performance in the classification. The increase rate is approximately of 17%.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesFractalsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedElectroencephalographyHumans

Identifiers

PMID31236108
PMCPMC6545768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.