Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31236009›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2019

Moving Just Enough Deep Sequencing Data to Get the Job Done.

Nicholas Mills, Ethan M Bensman, William L Poehlman, Walter B Ligon, F Alex Feltus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas MillsHolcombe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Ethan M BensmanSchool of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
William L PoehlmanDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Walter B LigonHolcombe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
F Alex FeltusDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-6114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAs the size of high-throughput DNA sequence datasets continues to grow, the cost of transferring and storing the datasets may prevent their processing in all but the largest data centers or commercial cloud providers. To lower this cost, it should be possible to process only a subset of the original data while still preserving the biological information of interest.

resultsUsing 4 high-throughput DNA sequence datasets of differing sequencing depth from 2 species as use cases, we demonstrate the effect of processing partial datasets on the number of detected RNA transcripts using an RNA-Seq workflow. We used transcript detection to decide on a cutoff point. We then physically transferred the minimal partial dataset and compared with the transfer of the full dataset, which showed a reduction of approximately 25% in the total transfer time. These results suggest that as sequencing datasets get larger, one way to speed up analysis is to simply transfer the minimal amount of data that still sufficiently detects biological signal. AVAILABILITY: All results were generated using public datasets from NCBI and publicly available open source software.

Indexed as

data transfersFASTQhigh-throughput DNA sequencingRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID31236009
PMCPMC6572328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.