Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31235991›Full record

ReviewJournal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society2019

Review Article: Tools and trends for probing brain neurochemistry.

Abraham G Beyene, Sarah J Yang, Markita P Landry

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structural and functional imaging of brains.Science China. Chemistry · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abraham G BeyeneDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720.
Sarah J YangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720.
Markita P Landry
QB3 · USChan Zuckerberg Initiative (United States) · US

Funding

Single-Molecule Imaging of Biological Trauma:Cytokine-Based Intracellular CommunicationR35GM128922 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LANDRY, MARKITA · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
Novel optical probe for dopamine release in neural circuitsR21EY029405 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FELLER, MARLA, LANDRY, MARKITA · 2018 to 2019
$428k
Optical montoring of modulatory neurotransmitter levels using new infrared nanonsensorsR21DA044010 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WILBRECHT, LINDA E · 2017 to 2018
$323k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY029405NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044010NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is composed of complex neuronal networks that interact on spatial and temporal scales that span several orders of magnitude. Uncovering how this circuitry gives rise to multifaceted phenomena such as perception, memory, and behavior remains one of the grand challenges in science today. A wide range of investigative methods have been developed to delve deeper into the inner workings of the brain, spanning the realms of molecular biology, genetics, chemistry, optics, and engineering, thereby forming a nexus of discovery that has accelerated our understanding of the brain. Whereas neuronal electrical excitability is a hallmark property of neurons, chemical signaling between neurons-mediated by hundreds of neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, hormones, and other signaling molecules-is equally important, but far more elusive in its regulation of brain function for motor control, learning, and behavior. To date, the brain's neurochemical state has been interrogated using classical tools borrowed from analytical chemistry, such as liquid chromatography and amperometry, and more recently, newly developed fluorescent sensors. Here, the authors review advances in the development of functional fluorescent probes that are beginning to expand their understanding of the neurochemical basis of brain function alongside device-based analytical tools that have already made extensive contributions to the field. The emphasis herein is on the paradigms of probe and device development, which follow certain design principles unique to the interrogation of brain chemistry.

Identifiers

PMID31235991
PMCPMC6559927
OpenAlexW2952727694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.