Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31235980›Full record

ArticleSynthesis2019

Conformational Dynamics in Asymmetric Catalysis: Is Catalyst Flexibility a Design Element?

Jennifer M Crawford, Matthew S Sigman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthesis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ratcheting synthesis.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. CONFPASS: Fast DFT Re-Optimizations of Structures from Conformation Searches.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer M CrawfordDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.
Matthew S SigmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States.

Funding

Using Numerical Analysis Tools to Design and Study Chiral CatalystsR01GM121383 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MILLER, SCOTT J, SIGMAN, MATTHEW S · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, highly selective low molecular weight catalysts have been designed to contain rigidifying structural elements. As a result, many proposed stereochemical models rely on steric repulsion for explaining the observed selectivity. Recently, as is the case for enzymatic systems, it has become apparent that some flexibility can be beneficial for imparting selectivity. Dynamic catalysts can reorganize to maximize attractive non-covalent interactions that stabilize the favored diastereomeric transition state, while minimizing repulsive non-covalent interactions for enhanced selectivity. This Short Review discusses catalyst conformational dynamics and how these effects have proven beneficial for a variety of catalyst classes, including

Indexed as

asymmetric catalysisconformational dynamicsnon-covalent interactionsorganocatalysispeptide catalysistropos ligands

Identifiers

PMID31235980
PMCPMC6590688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.