Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31235879›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2019

Unmasking senescence: context-dependent effects of SASP in cancer.

Douglas V Faget, Qihao Ren, Sheila A Stewart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 540 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
540citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
45.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

540 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 817 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. HIF1AJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

480 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas V FagetDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-0962
Qihao RenDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sheila A StewartDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. sheila.stewart@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-9576
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

MICROENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS OF TUMOR DORMANCYR01AG059244 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEWART, SHEILA A · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence plays a critical role in tumorigenesis. Once thought of as a tissue culture artefact by some researchers, senescence is now a major field of study. Although there are common molecular mechanisms that enforce the growth arrest that characterizes the phenotype, the impact of senescence is varied and can, in some instances, have opposite effects on tumorigenesis. It has become clearer that the cell of origin and the tissue in question dictate the impact of senescence on tumorigenesis. In this Review, we unravel this complexity by focusing on how senescence impacts tumorigenesis when it arises within incipient tumour cells versus stromal cells, and how these roles can change in different stages of disease progression. In addition, we highlight the diversity of the senescent phenotype and its functional output beyond growth arrest: the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Fortunately, a number of new genetic and pharmacologic tools have been developed that are now allowing the senescence phenotype to be parsed further.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCellular SenescenceDisease ProgressionDNA DamageFibroblastsHumansImmune SystemNeoplasmsPhenotypePromoter Regions, GeneticAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31235879
OpenAlexW2954445592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.