Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31235856›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

A novel potent autophagy inhibitor ECDD-S27 targets vacuolar ATPase and inhibits cancer cell survival.

Jiraporn Paha, Phongthon Kanjanasirirat, Bamroong Munyoo, Patoomratana Tuchinda, Naravut Suvannang, Chanin Nantasenamat, Kanokthip Boonyarattanakalin, Prasat Kittakoop, Sirawit Srikor, Gunganist Kongklad and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiraporn PahaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Phongthon KanjanasiriratExcellent Center for Drug Discovery, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Bamroong MunyooExcellent Center for Drug Discovery, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Patoomratana TuchindaExcellent Center for Drug Discovery, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Naravut SuvannangExcellent Center for Drug Discovery, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Chanin NantasenamatCenter of Data Mining and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Kanokthip BoonyarattanakalinCollege of Nanotechnology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand.
Prasat KittakoopChulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand.
Sirawit SrikorDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Gunganist KongkladDepartment of Physics, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Noppawan RangkaseneeExcellent Center for Drug Discovery, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Suradej HongengExcellent Center for Drug Discovery, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Pongsak UtaisincharoenDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Suparerk BorwornpinyoExcellent Center for Drug Discovery, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Marisa PonpuakDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. marisa.pon@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2889-1314
Mahidol University · THChulabhorn Graduate Institute · THKing Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a conserved lysosomal-dependent cellular degradation process and its dysregulation has been linked to numerous diseases including neurodegeneration, infectious diseases, and cancer. Modulation of autophagy is therefore considered as an attractive target for disease intervention. We carried out a high-content image analysis screen of natural product-derived compounds to discover novel autophagy modulating molecules. Our screen identified ECDD-S27 as the most effective compound for increasing the number of autophagic vacuoles inside cells. The structure of ECDD-S27 revealed that it is a derivative of cleistanthin A, a natural arylnaphthalene lignan glycoside found in plants. ECDD-S27 increases the number of autophagic vacuoles by inhibiting the autophagic flux and is able to restrict the survival of different cancer cells at low nanomolar concentrations. Molecular docking and SERS analysis showed that ECDD-S27 may potentially target the V-ATPase. Upon treatment of various cancer cells with ECDD-S27, the V-ATPase activity is potently inhibited thereby resulting in the loss of lysosomal acidification. Taken together, these data indicated that ECDD-S27 retards the autophagy pathway by targeting the V-ATPase and inhibits cancer cell survival. The observed antitumor activity without cytotoxicity to normal cells suggests the therapeutic potential warranting further studies on lead optimization of the compound for cancer treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAutophagosomesAutophagyCell SurvivalGlycosidesHeLa CellsHep G2 CellsHT29 CellsHumansLignansMiceRAW 264.7 CellsVacuolar Proton-Translocating ATPasesAntineoplastic AgentscleistanthinGlycosidesLignansVacuolar Proton-Translocating ATPases

Identifiers

PMID31235856
PMCPMC6591302
OpenAlexW2952978525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.