Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31235780›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Probing the active fraction of soil microbiomes using BONCAT-FACS.

Estelle Couradeau, Joelle Sasse, Danielle Goudeau, Nandita Nath, Terry C Hazen, Ben P Bowen, Romy Chakraborty, Rex R Malmstrom, Trent R Northen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Metabolic inequality in microbial communities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Detergent-based separation of microbes from marine particles.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Estelle CouradeauEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3947-2529
Joelle SasseEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-9888
Danielle GoudeauJoint Genome Institute, Department of Energy, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3785-032X
Nandita NathJoint Genome Institute, Department of Energy, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Terry C HazenUniversity of Tennessee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2536-9993
Ben P BowenJoint Genome Institute, Department of Energy, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Romy ChakrabortyEarth Science and Environmental Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9326-554X
Rex R MalmstromJoint Genome Institute, Department of Energy, Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
Trent R NorthenEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. TRNorthen@lbl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-3259
Joint Genome Institute · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to link soil microbial diversity to soil processes requires technologies that differentiate active microbes from extracellular DNA and dormant cells. Here, we use BONCAT (bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging) to measure translationally active cells in soils. We compare the active population of two soil depths from Oak Ridge (Tennessee, USA) and find that a maximum of 25-70% of the extractable cells are active. Analysis of 16S rRNA sequences from BONCAT-positive cells recovered by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) reveals that the phylogenetic composition of the active fraction is distinct from the total population of extractable cells. Some members of the community are found to be active at both depths independently of their abundance rank, suggesting that the incubation conditions favor the activity of similar organisms. We conclude that BONCAT-FACS is effective for interrogating the active fraction of soil microbiomes in situ and provides a new approach for uncovering the links between soil processes and specific microbial groups.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyAmino AcidsBacteriaFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStaining and LabelingAmino AcidsFluorescent DyesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31235780
PMCPMC6591230
OpenAlexW2950422173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.