Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31235674›Full record

ArticleAging2019

Placental epigenetic clocks: estimating gestational age using placental DNA methylation levels.

Yunsung Lee, Sanaa Choufani, Rosanna Weksberg, Samantha L Wilson, Victor Yuan, Amber Burt, Carmen Marsit, Ake T Lu, Beate Ritz, Jon Bohlin and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Yunsung LeeDepartment of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Sanaa ChoufaniGenetics and Genome Biology Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rosanna WeksbergGenetics and Genome Biology Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Samantha L WilsonDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Victor YuanDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Amber BurtDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Carmen MarsitDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Ake T LuDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Beate RitzDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Jon BohlinCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Håkon K GjessingCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Jennifer R HarrisDepartment of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Per MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Alexandra M BinderDepartment of Epidemiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Wendy P RobinsonDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Astanand JugessurDepartment of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Steve HorvathDepartment of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USEmory University · USHospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of British Columbia · CABC Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI William Michael Caudle · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
Validation and optimization of epigenetic clocksU01AG060908 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RITZ, BEATE R. · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Placental Functional Networks Linking Developmental Pesticide Exposure and Offspring NeurodevelopmentR01ES029212 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CAUDLE, WILLIAM MICHAEL, CHEN, JIA · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Enriching the Rhode Island Child Health StudyR24ES028507 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit, LAURA R STROUD · 2017 to 2026
$2.3M
Using 'omics to build an atlas of placental development and function across pregnancyR01HD089713 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI ROBINSON, WENDY · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
Epigenetic Age as a Marker of Reproductive Age and Modifier of Invasive Breast Cancer Risk Among Postmenopausal WomenK07CA225856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI BINDER, ALEXANDRA MARGARET LYNN · 2018 to 2020
$468k
Environmental influences and function of cytosine modification in human placentaR21ES028226 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MARSIT, CARMEN JOSEPH · 2017 to 2018
$429k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA225856NIA NIH HHS U01 AG060908NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089713NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES028226NIEHS NIH HHS R24 ES028507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human pan-tissue epigenetic clock is widely used for estimating age across the entire lifespan, but it does not lend itself well to estimating gestational age (GA) based on placental DNAm methylation (DNAm) data. We replicate previous findings demonstrating a strong correlation between GA and genome-wide DNAm changes. Using substantially more DNAm arrays (n=1,102 in the training set) than a previous study, we present three new placental epigenetic clocks: 1) a robust placental clock (RPC) which is unaffected by common pregnancy complications (e.g., gestational diabetes, preeclampsia), and 2) a control placental clock (CPC) constructed using placental samples from pregnancies without known placental pathology, and 3) a refined RPC for uncomplicated term pregnancies. These placental clocks are highly accurate estimators of GA based on placental tissue; e.g., predicted GA based on RPC is highly correlated with actual GA (r>0.95 in test data, median error less than one week). We show that epigenetic clocks derived from cord blood or other tissues do not accurately estimate GA in placental samples. While fundamentally different from Horvath's pan-tissue epigenetic clock, placental clocks closely track fetal age during development and may have interesting applications.

Indexed as

Biological ClocksDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGestational AgeDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansPlacentaPregnancyDNA methylationepigenetic clockgestational ageplacenta

Identifiers

PMID31235674
PMCPMC6628997
OpenAlexW2956136191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.