Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31235601›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Cochlear partition anatomy and motion in humans differ from the classic view of mammals.

Stefan Raufer, John J Guinan, Hideko Heidi Nakajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Volume rendering technique and high-resolution microCT: 3D exploration of the cochlear anatomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. How the Human Cochlea Moves: Biomechanical Modeling of a Wide, Layered Osseous Spiral Lamina.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative Evaluation of the 3D Anatomy of the Human Osseous Spiral Lamina Using MicroCT.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan RauferEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114; sraufer2@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4471-2029
John J GuinanEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114.ORCID 0000-0003-1774-4738
Hideko Heidi NakajimaEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA 02114.ORCID 0000-0002-1377-1934

Funding

Mechanics of Human Middle & Inner Ear: Basic Science & Clinical ApplicationR01DC013303 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI NAKAJIMA, HIDEKO HEIDI · 2013 to 2024
$4.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammals detect sound through mechanosensitive cells of the cochlear organ of Corti that rest on the basilar membrane (BM). Motions of the BM and organ of Corti have been studied at the cochlear base in various laboratory animals, and the assumption has been that the cochleas of all mammals work similarly. In the classic view, the BM attaches to a stationary osseous spiral lamina (OSL), the tectorial membrane (TM) attaches to the limbus above the stationary OSL, and the BM is the major moving element, with a peak displacement near its center. Here, we measured the motion and studied the anatomy of the human cochlear partition (CP) at the cochlear base of fresh human cadaveric specimens. Unlike the classic view, we identified a soft-tissue structure between the BM and OSL in humans, which we name the CP "bridge." We measured CP transverse motion in humans and found that the OSL moved like a plate hinged near the modiolus, with motion increasing from the modiolus to the bridge. The bridge moved almost as much as the BM, with the maximum CP motion near the bridge-BM connection. BM motion accounts for 100% of CP volume displacement in the classic view, but accounts for only 27 to 43% in the base of humans. In humans, the TM-limbus attachment is above the moving bridge, not above a fixed structure. These results challenge long-held assumptions about cochlear mechanics in humans. In addition, animal apical anatomy (in

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsBasilar MembraneBiomechanical PhenomenaCochleaEar, InnerGuinea PigsHearingHumansMammalsSoundTectorial MembraneVibrationbasilar membranecochleahearinginner eartuning

Identifiers

PMID31235601
PMCPMC6628837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.