ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2019
Parametric Study of Acoustic Droplet Vaporization Thresholds and Payload Release From Acoustically-Responsive Scaffolds.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- From microbubbles to macro-control: Linking ultrasound-induced microarchitecture to precise drug release kinetics from acoustically responsive scaffolds.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Real-time drug release monitoring from acoustically responsive scaffolds.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Janus acoustically responsive scaffolds for sequential drug release with phase-programmed steady and pulsatile kinetics.Journal of colloid and interface science · 2025Article
- Real-Time Optical and Acoustic Characterization of Phase-Shift Droplets for Drug-Delivery Applications.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Acoustically responsive scaffolds: Unraveling release kinetics and mechanisms for sustained, steady drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024Article
- Real-time spatiotemporal characterization of mechanics and sonoporation of acoustic droplet vaporization in acoustically responsive scaffolds.Applied physics letters · 2023Article
- Bubble nucleation and dynamics in acoustic droplet vaporization: a review of concepts, applications, and new directions.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Review
- Impact of Perfluoropentane Microdroplets Diameter and Concentration on Acoustic Droplet Vaporization Transition Efficiency and Oxygen Scavenging.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-Induced Mechanical Compaction in Acoustically Responsive Scaffolds Promotes Spatiotemporally Modulated Signaling in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Making waves: how ultrasound-targeted drug delivery is changing pharmaceutical approaches.Materials advances · 2022Review
- Spatiotemporal control of myofibroblast activation in acoustically-responsive scaffolds via ultrasound-induced matrix stiffening.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Article
- Extracellular vesicles: Targeting the heart.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Release of basic fibroblast growth factor from acoustically-responsive scaffolds promotes therapeutic angiogenesis in the hind limb ischemia model.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021Article
- Spatially-directed angiogenesis using ultrasound-controlled release of basic fibroblast growth factor from acoustically-responsive scaffolds.Acta biomaterialia · 2021Article
- Stable and transient bubble formation in acoustically-responsive scaffolds by acoustic droplet vaporization: theory and application in sequential release.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2021Article
- Spatially-directed cell migration in acoustically-responsive scaffolds through the controlled delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Article
- Standing wave-assisted acoustic droplet vaporization for single and dual payload release in acoustically-responsive scaffolds.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2020Article
- Spatiotemporal control of micromechanics and microstructure in acoustically-responsive scaffolds using acoustic droplet vaporization.Soft matter · 2020Article
- Using Acoustic Fields to Fabricate ECM-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine Applications.Recent progress in materials · 2020Article
- Acoustic Droplet Vaporization in Acoustically Responsive Scaffolds: Effects of Frequency of Excitation, Volume Fraction and Threshold Determination Method.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrogels are commonly used for the delivery of bioactive molecules, especially growth factors and cytokines capable of stimulating tissue regeneration. Regenerative processes are regulated by the concentrations and spatiotemporal presentations of these molecules. With conventional hydrogels, these critical delivery parameters cannot be actively modulated after implantation. We have developed composite hydrogel scaffolds where payload release is non-invasively modulated, in an on-demand manner, using ultrasound (US). These acoustically-responsive scaffolds (ARSs) consist of a fibrin matrix doped with a payload-carrying, perfluorocarbon (PFC) double emulsion. Previously, acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV) was used to trigger release of a pro-angiogenic growth factor, encapsulated in the ARS, which stimulated blood vessel formation in vivo. In the present study, we assess how characteristics of the monodispersed emulsion, fibrin matrix, and US impact ADV thresholds and the release efficiency of a dextran payload. ADV thresholds increased with the molecular weight of the PFC in the emulsion and inversely with the volume fraction of emulsion in the ARS. Payload release from ARSs with perfluoroheptane (C7) or perfluorooctane (C8) emulsions was dependent on the number of z-planes of US used to generate ADV and inversely dependent on the lateral spacing. Conversely, release from ARSs with perfluoropentane (C5) or perfluorohexane (C6) emulsions was less dependent on these US exposure parameters. After ADV, payload diffusion decreased significantly in ARSs with C5 or C6 emulsions compared with ARSs with C7 or C8 emulsions. The expansion of the ARS after ADV decreased with the molecular weight of the PFC. Non-selective release increased with the molecular weight of the PFC and thrombin concentration. Overall, these findings can be used for optimization of ARS properties and US parameters in future therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.