Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234930›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

The association between attendings' feedback and residents' reporting of near-misses.

Sukhesh Sudan, Philip Lewalski, Judy Arnetz, John Vanschagen, Bengt Arnetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sukhesh SudanDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, 15 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA. sudansuk@msu.edu.
Philip LewalskiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Judy ArnetzDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, 15 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
John VanschagenDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, 15 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.
Bengt ArnetzDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, 15 Michigan St. NE, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Clinical Learning Environment Review report suggests that residents in clinical learning environments underreport their near-misses, an indicator of patient safety. Furthermore, when the residents report these events, they receive little feedback from their attendings. Although, various studies emphasize the importance of feedback given to the residents, the association between feedback and patient safety has not been explored. This study was conducted in 28 emergency medicine residents in a level 1 trauma center. A recent study in the same cohort found that residents' stress biomarker levels and patient acuity were positively related to their near-misses reports. The current study hypothesizes that residents that receive constructive feedback on their performance from their attendings would report more near-misses.

resultsLinear regression was used to determine whether ratings of attendings' feedback predicted residents' reports of near-misses. Feedback was positively related to residents' near-misses reports even after controlling for patient acuity and stress biomarker levels. This may be due to the residents becoming more aware of what a near miss is or it may also be that constructive feedback encourages them to report more near-misses as they may view this as a learning opportunity.

Indexed as

FeedbackInternship and ResidencyAdultBiomarkersFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleNear Miss, HealthcareSelf ReportBiomarkersAttendingsFeedbackNear-missesResidents

Identifiers

PMID31234930
PMCPMC6591858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.