Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234852›Full record

SynthesisBMC women's health2019

Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seung Hyun Lee, So Ra Oh, Yeon Jean Cho, Myoungseok Han, Jung-Woo Park, Su Jin Kim, Jeong Hye Yun, Sun Yi Choe, Joong Sub Choi, Jong Woon Bae

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials Assessing Sexuality in Hysterectomized Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Risk factors for infection after hysterectomy for benign disease.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Are There Racial Disparities in Perioperative Pain? A Retrospective Study of a Gynecological Surgery Cohort.Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Hyun LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
So Ra OhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Jean ChoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
Myoungseok HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Woo ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
Su Jin KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Hye YunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
Sun Yi ChoeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea.
Joong Sub ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Woon BaeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, 26 Daesingongwon-Ro Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-812, Republic of Korea. jwbae@dau.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0003-3423-852X
Dong-A University · KRHanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are various surgical approaches of hysterectomy for benign indications. This study aimed to compare vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) with respect to their complications and operative outcomes.

methodsWe selected randomised controlled trials that compared VH with LH for benign gynaecological indications. We included studies published after January 2000 in the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library). The primary outcome was comparison of the complication rate. The secondary outcomes were comparisons of operating time, blood loss, intraoperative conversion, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and duration of recuperation. We used Review Manager 5.3 software to perform the meta-analysis.

resultsEighteen studies of 1618 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed no differences in overall complications, intraoperative conversion, postoperative pain on the day of surgery and at 48 h, length of hospital stay and recuperation time between VH and LH. VH was associated with a shorter operating time and lower postoperative pain at 24 h than LH.

conclusionsWhen both surgical approaches are feasible, VH should remain the surgery of choice for benign hysterectomy.

Indexed as

Operative TimeFemaleGynecologyHumansHysterectomyHysterectomy, VaginalLaparoscopyLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainLaparoscopic hysterectomyMeta-analysisVaginal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID31234852
PMCPMC6591934
OpenAlexW2953030161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.