Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234849›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Utilization willingness of institutional care between disabled and non-disabled seniors: evidence from Jiangsu, China.

Na Chen, Xin Li, Ni Yuan, Cheng-Chao Zhou, Chang-Qing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of Disability among the Chinese Older Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Na ChenSchool of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, People's Republic of China.
Xin LiSchool of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, People's Republic of China.
Ni YuanSchool of Public Health, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, People's Republic of China.
Cheng-Chao ZhouSchool of Public Health, Shandong University, 44 Wen-hua-xi Road, Jinan, 250100, Shandong, China. zhouchengchao@sdu.edu.cn.
Chang-Qing WangNanjing Medical University, 101 Longmian Road, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, China. cqwang1962@163.com.
Nanjing Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China 71573139National Social Science Foundation of China 15CRK015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to rapidly growing number of old adults and diminishing supportive functions of family in China, the issue of willingness to use institutional care is of high priority, especially for disabled seniors. The objective of this study is to compare the willingness of institutional care and its determinants between disabled and non-disabled seniors in China.

methods2493 seniors (60+) were randomly selected from a cross-sectional study conducted in three urban districts and three rural counties in Jiangsu Province. Binary logistic regression model was employed to examine differences towards the preference for institutional care between two subgroups, and to identify factors associated with willingness of institutional care between disabled and non-disabled seniors.

resultsOf 2493 respondents, 402 (16.1%) were disabled seniors. Overall, 14.2% of the participants had willingness for institutional care in Jiangsu, China. The willingness for institutional care among non-disabled seniors (OR = 0.513; 95%CI 0.387-9.680) was significantly lower than that among disabled ones. The preference for institutional care of both disabled and non-disabled seniors was associated with household income. The willingness of institutional care was also related to age, education and living arrangement among disabled seniors. Meanwhile, non-disabled seniors who had non-communicable diseases were found to be more likely to choose elder care in institution.

conclusionsOur findings indicated that the willingness for institutional care among disabled seniors was significantly higher than that among non-disabled ones. Household income was determinant of utilization willingness for institutionalization both in disabled and non-disable seniors. Different policies should be made or modified for disabled and non-disabled seniors separately.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInstitutionalizationLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePersons with DisabilitiesSocioeconomic FactorsChinaDisabled seniorsInstitutional careNon-disabled seniorsWillingness

Identifiers

PMID31234849
PMCPMC6591941
OpenAlexW2954457409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.