Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234797›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

NPCMF: Nearest Profile-based Collaborative Matrix Factorization method for predicting miRNA-disease associations.

Ying-Lian Gao, Zhen Cui, Jin-Xing Liu, Juan Wang, Chun-Hou Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying-Lian GaoLibrary of Qufu Normal University, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China.
Zhen CuiSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China.
Jin-Xing LiuSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China. sdcavell@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-2149
Juan WangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China.
Chun-Hou ZhengCo-Innovation Center for Information Supply and Assurance Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61572284National Natural Science Foundation of China 61872220National Natural Science Foundation of China 61873001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting meaningful miRNA-disease associations (MDAs) is costly. Therefore, an increasing number of researchers are beginning to focus on methods to predict potential MDAs. Thus, prediction methods with improved accuracy are under development. An efficient computational method is proposed to be crucial for predicting novel MDAs. For improved experimental productivity, large biological datasets are used by researchers. Although there are many effective and feasible methods to predict potential MDAs, the possibility remains that these methods are flawed.

resultsA simple and effective method, known as Nearest Profile-based Collaborative Matrix Factorization (NPCMF), is proposed to identify novel MDAs. The nearest profile is introduced to our method to achieve the highest AUC value compared with other advanced methods. For some miRNAs and diseases without any association, we use the nearest neighbour information to complete the prediction.

conclusionsTo evaluate the performance of our method, five-fold cross-validation is used to calculate the AUC value. At the same time, three disease cases, gastric neoplasms, rectal neoplasms and colonic neoplasms, are used to predict novel MDAs on a gold-standard dataset. We predict the vast majority of known MDAs and some novel MDAs. Finally, the prediction accuracy of our method is determined to be better than that of other existing methods. Thus, the proposed prediction model can obtain reliable experimental results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArea Under CurveColonic NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMicroRNAsRectal NeoplasmsROC CurveStomach NeoplasmsMicroRNAsGaussian interaction profileMatrix factorizationMiRNA-disease association predictionNearest profile

Identifiers

PMID31234797
PMCPMC6591872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.