Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234782›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2019

Ethiodized poppyseed oil versus ioversol for image quality and adverse events in hysterosalpingography: a prospective cohort study.

Yiqing Tan, Shilin Zheng, Wenfeng Lei, Fuhua Wang, Shengpan Jiang, Ting Zeng, Bei Zhou, Fan Hong

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Feasibility of 2-Hour vs 24-Hour Delayed Radiography in Oil-Based Hysterosalpingography: A Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiqing TanDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China. tanyiqing72@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-3900
Shilin ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Wenfeng LeiDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Fuhua WangDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Shengpan JiangDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Ting ZengDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Bei ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Fan HongDepartment of Radiology, Wuhan Third Hospital, Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University, 241 Liuyang Road, Wuhan, 430063, Hubei, China.
Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the image quality and adverse events (AEs) of ethiodized poppyseed oil (EPO) compared with ioversol as contrast agents in hysterosalpingography (HSG).

methodsTwo hundred twenty-eight patients underwent HSG were consecutively recruited in this prospective cohort study, and were accordingly divided into EPO group (N = 165) and ioversol group (N = 63). The quality of image was assessed according to the European Guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. AEs during, within 2 h and at 1-month post-HSG were recorded.

resultsEPO displayed elevated image quality compared with ioversol including the total image quality score (P < 0.001), the cervical canal display score (P < 0.001), shape and outline of uterus score (P < 0.01), cervical mucosa or folds score (P < 0.001), oviduct isthmus score (P < 0.001), ampulla and fimbriae of oviduct score (P < 0.001) and celiac diffuse image score (P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression displayed that EPO (P < 0.001) was an independent predictive factor for increased total image quality score. AEs were similar between EPO group and ioversol group during and within 2 h post-HSG (all P > 0.05). However, at 1-month post-HSG, the number of patients had unchanged and faded menstrual blood color decreased but the proportion of patients with deepened menstrual color increased in EPO group compared with ioversol group (P = 0.007). In addition, the number of patients had iodine residue in uterine cavity was elevated in EPO group compared with ioversol group (P < 0.001).

conclusionEPO is more efficient in image quality and equally tolerant compared to ioversol as contrast agents in HSG.

Indexed as

AdultContrast MediaEthiodized OilFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleHumansHysterosalpingographyInfertility, FemaleLinear ModelsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiographic Image EnhancementTriiodobenzoic AcidsYoung AdultContrast MediaEthiodized OilioversolTriiodobenzoic AcidsAdverse eventsEthiodized poppyseed oilHysterosalpingographyImage qualityIoversol

Identifiers

PMID31234782
PMCPMC6591817
OpenAlexW2950779644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.